Quote: ooh espanol! lolThe 5770 with an ~950mhz OC should beat an 4890, but the 4890 OCs great also.What is your case/PSU, and is power/heat important?
Quote: Then get a better PSU and a cheaper 5770.This is great for the price: http://www.pixmania.com/es/es/2997365/art/enermax/alimentacion-pc-cyclops-4.htmlhttp://www.pixmania.com/es/es/4771707/art/asus/radeon-hd-5770-512-mb-gdd.htmlyou can still hit 900mhz, except it would be a bit hotter.What is your system/monitor;s specs anyways?
Bluescreendeath said: 4890 at stock beats a 5770 at stock by 15-20%
Quote: for 1280*1024 there is no need for 1GB, unless you plan to upgrade a 1080P monitor, 512MB save you money and perform identically.ANd dont get the Urano 600W, low quality and only about 50W better than the enermax.
andylp4ever said: yeah i know that.... is the vapor-x capable to raise performance like a 4890?
OvrClkr said: It's obvious that the 4890 is faster in terms of "raw" performance, the 5770 is basically the same as a GTX 260 give or take..
andylp4ever said: so should i buy the 4890....for performance? or the 5770 for new technology, dx11, and other features?thanks a lot ....