Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Low profile 9600. galaxy/sparkle/ or zotac

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
June 20, 2010 4:44:39 AM

having difficulty deciding which manufacturer is best for low profile 9600
... i guess i've ruled out sparkle

so that leaves me with GALAXY: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/ite...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...

and ZOTAC : http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/ite...




my budget is real low ; and i have to fit the card into a Dell 531s. (low profile) the psu is rated at 250 W, i know that's less than the recommended but the computer right now doesn't even get to 100 so adding a ~60-70 W card won't hurt. Im just wondering which card is a better buy; but if you have any other recommendations feel free to reply.

Best solution

a c 1411 U Graphics card
June 20, 2010 1:21:18 PM

To be on the safe side I would take the Galaxy since it does not require external power and is cheaper after MIR (newegg). If it is just between the manufacturers then I would get Zotac before Galaxy.
Share
June 20, 2010 1:53:04 PM

,, by external power do you mean needs a 6 pin connector etc?
m
0
l
Related resources
June 20, 2010 1:54:11 PM

ok thanks
m
0
l
a c 1411 U Graphics card
June 20, 2010 2:05:52 PM

Yes
m
0
l
June 21, 2010 12:38:32 AM

Best answer selected by frazik.
m
0
l
!