Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Pentium 4 HT 3.2 gHz vs Pentium D 3.2 gHz

Tags:
  • CPUs
  • Pentium
  • Processors
  • Dual Core
Last response: in CPUs
Share
September 30, 2010 5:59:57 AM

I did wonder about this but is there any noticeable difference between the Pentium 4 HT 3.2 gHz or the Pentium D 3.2 gHz processors? I was thinking that HT and dual core are very close related so I thought they are pretty close on performance. Maybe the dual core will be a little faster but I would assume that both would be about the same. Just compairing two processors that have the same speed but just one is a HT and one is a dual core.

More about : pentium ghz pentium ghz

a b à CPUs
September 30, 2010 6:13:33 AM

The pentium D should be quite a bit faster. Hyperthreading is nice, but it's no substitute for an actual core.
m
0
l
September 30, 2010 6:35:30 AM

The celeron has an FSB of 533 where the Pentium's is 800. The celeron will have less L2 cache than the pentium
m
0
l
Related resources
a b à CPUs
September 30, 2010 8:00:21 AM

I have a P4-HT and PD, and the Pentium D is a few miles ahead of the HT. The Pentium D could still run newer games today at usually high settings, while with the Pentium 4 - HT games would usually stutter (with the same video card and ram).
m
0
l
September 30, 2010 11:13:59 AM

cjl said:
The pentium D should be quite a bit faster. Hyperthreading is nice, but it's no substitute for an actual core.

^+3
m
0
l
September 30, 2010 3:31:40 PM

Just wondering but what do you guys mean when you say +3 or +2? What does that have to do with the question I was asking? But eather way it looks like dual core is noticeable better than HT.
m
0
l
a c 106 à CPUs
September 30, 2010 3:42:39 PM

+nn means they agree what is being said.

I agree with cjl so ........ +4
m
0
l
!