juicycrapachino Distinguished May 8, 2010 232 0 18,690 Oct 2, 2010 #1 Can somebody explain the difference between the 2 processors listed in the thread title? Is there really a good performance difference? Thanks in advance...
Can somebody explain the difference between the 2 processors listed in the thread title? Is there really a good performance difference? Thanks in advance...
Solution Timop Oct 2, 2010 Simply, ones clocked 133Mhz higher due to binning. The real-world difference is pretty negligible.
Timop Distinguished Feb 27, 2010 3,070 0 21,160 Oct 2, 2010 Solution #2 Simply, ones clocked 133Mhz higher due to binning. The real-world difference is pretty negligible. Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
juicycrapachino Distinguished May 8, 2010 232 0 18,690 Oct 2, 2010 #4 Damn, that was fast lol. Does 5% sound worth 10 extra dollars? UPDATE: NVM...I should be answering that question myself... Upvote 0 Downvote
Damn, that was fast lol. Does 5% sound worth 10 extra dollars? UPDATE: NVM...I should be answering that question myself...
rolli59 Titan Oct 27, 2007 47,790 283 130,890 Oct 2, 2010 #5 5% more performance for 3.6% higher price. Worth it for people that do not overclock. Upvote 0 Downvote
juicycrapachino Distinguished May 8, 2010 232 0 18,690 Oct 2, 2010 #6 Well. I was planning to overclock anyways... probably with the intel turbo boost though... Upvote 0 Downvote
juicycrapachino Distinguished May 8, 2010 232 0 18,690 Oct 2, 2010 #8 Best answer selected by juicycrapachino. Upvote 0 Downvote