Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
I'm giving up on Toshiba latops. The early ones I had were great -
small, reliable, and above all STURDY. Nowadays, they have become
larger, and much less solid. It's time to move on!
The problem is basically a question of poor design. My 3000 A425 has
a latch made of plastic, an absurd material for such a small,
high-impact and vitally important part. It has broken twice. The
replacement cost is $100 per latch.
The surround to the catch is made out of the same fragile plastic. On
it hinges the whole architecture of the machine, not strong anyway
because of the two removable bays (CD bay and battery bay). To
replace the plastic part in which the catch is embedded would require
replacing the casing of the whole machine - a huge operation, very
costly.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
I don't know the particular modell to which you refer, but there are
Toshiba laptops and Toshiba laptops. As I recall, The Satellite models
are the cheapest and have the shortest warranties. Then come the
Satellite Pro models. Then there used to be (are there still?) the Tecra
models. Etc.
Perce
On 11/24/04 07:01 am Matthew Pollock tossed the following ingredients
into the ever-growing pot of cybersoup:
> I'm giving up on Toshiba latops. The early ones I had were great -
> small, reliable, and above all STURDY. Nowadays, they have become
> larger, and much less solid. It's time to move on!
>
> The problem is basically a question of poor design. My 3000 A425 has
> a latch made of plastic, an absurd material for such a small,
> high-impact and vitally important part. It has broken twice. The
> replacement cost is $100 per latch.
>
> The surround to the catch is made out of the same fragile plastic. On
> it hinges the whole architecture of the machine, not strong anyway
> because of the two removable bays (CD bay and battery bay). To
> replace the plastic part in which the catch is embedded would require
> replacing the casing of the whole machine - a huge operation, very
> costly.
>
> This is just bad design.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.