Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > [Solved] Different Manufacturers

[Solved] Different Manufacturers

Forum Graphics & Displays : Graphics Cards [Solved] Different Manufacturers

Best answer from ct1615.

Word :    Username :           
 

I've seen that different manufacturers can make certain graphics cards with different amounts of RAM. I thought they're all typically the same except the accessories and clocking and such. Does the manufacturer of the card actually affect it that much?

For example I was looking up the HD 5850 and I saw Sapphires that came in 2gb Ram but most of them were 1gb ram.

Reply to iLiketoEat
Register or log in to remove.
Best answer

its a marketing trick, the 5850 can't effectively use that much ram.

benchmarks of the 5850 2GB and 1GB. most games they are even or a 1-3 FPS difference.

http://www.overclockersclub.com/re [...] _2gb/7.htm


Message edited by ct1615 on 07-04-2010 at 05:22:22 AM
Reply to ct1615

So if they use double the RAM than the OEM card then it really doesn't make much difference but the the size of the hole in your pockets? Thanks :)

Reply to iLiketoEat

The 5850 can use that much ram, but you'd need to be using 3 full HD monitors on eyefinity to even come close.

For gaming, as ct1615 stated, the difference isn't worth the money.

Reply to pepperman

pepperman wrote :

The 5850 can use that much ram, but you'd need to be using 3 full HD monitors on eyefinity to even come close.




that's completely incorrect. the core clock and interface is too slow to use that full amount of RAM in gaming, eyefinity, or any other Software. too many noobs on these boards making idiotic statements that more memory equals better performance. its no different then have a PC with a slow dual core CPU and 6GB of RAM. it will perform just as fast with 3GB of ram.

Reply to ct1615

ct1615 wrote :

that's completely incorrect. the core clock and interface is too slow to use that full amount of RAM in gaming, eyefinity, or any other Software. too many noobs on these boards making idiotic statements that more memory equals better performance. its no different then have a PC with a slow dual core CPU and 6GB of RAM. it will perform just as fast with 3GB of ram.



You couldn't be more wrong (or discourteous); if it couldn't use more ram, you would see 0 performance gain from games; when looking at any benchmark, however, we do see slight performance gains as we approach higher resolutions (as seen here http://www.overclockersclub.com/re [...] xic_2gb/). This shows that the interface can indeed take advantage of more than 1GB of ram (how much more can't be said without testing custom cards, buts that's off topic). Using this knowledge, we can deduce that the card would benefit over a standard 1 GB card for eyefinity (whether its worth it or not is up to the buyer, but slight gain is still gain).

As for you're analogy to a slow CPU with lots of ram, you must have never worked with a server or workstation; I've seen 700 MHz p3s max out 2 GB of ram without a sweat and you're telling me that a modern slow CPU (which would run circles around our old p3s) will only take advantage of 3 out of 6 GB of ram? What an idiotic statement...

Reply to pepperman

While we're on the subject of different manufacturers...It's been about 5 years since I built my last computer and I haven't been keeping up much with things lately, so maybe I've missed something, but does ATI still manufacture their video cards at all? I've been trying to get my hands on a 5850 for a new build and I can't find any ATI branded 5850s. Everything is third party using ATI chipset. I've searched all over the web and the closest thing I can find to an answer is that the supply is low. When you search the website, Newegg doesn't even mark ATI branded cards as an option, let alone mark them as out of stock. What gives? Last two cards I got were 9800pro and X1600 retail cards and they were ATI branded, so I know they manufactured their own retail cards at least at one time. What gives? :??:

Reply to Blue_Helix712

ATI pretty much is "just" a chip supplier now.

Reply to jsc

 

Actually a cheap dual-core cpu will be able to use 6GB, when I used my E4500 to build a map in UDK there was a difference from just using Vista's speedboost.


Message edited by Mousemonkey on 07-05-2010 at 02:00:33 AM
Reply to sabot00

ct1615 wrote :

at 2560x1600 res
far cry 2 1FPS diff
crysis 1 FPS diff
darkest of days even
CoD even
warhammer 2FPS diff.....2FPS....2FPS...that's like HUGE!!
Batman 4FPS diff...omg...4FPS!!...THAT TOTALLY PROVES YOUR POINT!!!...
RE5 1FPS
L4D 3FPS

 

so not only did I prove you have no clue to what you are talking about but I also proved you are a liar! Not a single game tested showed more then 4FPS diff (you stated several had 10FPS!) but that actual increase was often 0-1 FPS! fact's don't lie but you do!

 

though I was mistaken; it was only an 8 FPS increase, seen in Batman 1280 x 1024).

 

The fact remains, however, that more RAM did increase performance, which counters what you stated. I do agree that the added cost isn't worth the card with more RAM, however.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Mousemonkey on 07-05-2010 at 02:01:11 AM
Reply to pepperman

pepperman wrote :

No I was mistaken; it was only an 8 FPS increase, seen in Batman 1280 x 1024).

 

The fact remains, however, that more RAM did increase performance, which counters what you stated. I do agree that the added cost isn't worth the card with more RAM, however.

 

....one game....at 1280x1024......174 to 166 FPS....5% increase.....totally proves your point....outside of every other test that proves it false as stated above.

 

this is me waving goodbye to you to go back into your mother's basement and keep playing WoW :hello:


Message edited by Mousemonkey on 07-05-2010 at 02:01:35 AM
Reply to ct1615

Enough with the insults, I'm tired of deleting and editing so any more and I start banning. You have been warned.

------------------------------ http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/3995/bl11.gif
Reply to Mousemonkey

So the main point is that is causes a slight performance increase that's minuscule and really doesn't justify the price difference? So it would be better to get a better card than it is to get a higher RAM version?

Reply to iLiketoEat

iLiketoEat wrote :

So the main point is that is causes a slight performance increase that's minuscule and really doesn't justify the price difference? So it would be better to get a better card than it is to get a higher RAM version?



If you are running a single screen and you want to spend your money wisely get the 1Gb version ;) , just like ct said, its a marketing trick unless you feel that an extra 1-3FPS is worth the difference.


------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Whether the GPU itself can actually handle the 2GB of VRAM is beside the point. The 2GB won't be needed unless you start running more extreme resolutions anyhow. Eyefinity with 3 x 1920x1080 monitors as an example. With a typical high res monitor the memory difference wouldn't matter anyhow.

------------------------------ i5-750 4Ghz @ 1.32V / Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P / Xigmatek HDT-S1283
GTX 470 SLI / 8GB GSkill DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 @1.5v
2 x WD Caviar Black 1TB / Thermaltake Armor BWS8003
Win 7 64bit / Antec TPQ-850 / Vantage P31806 / 3dMark06 25351 / 3dMark11 P7597
Reply to jerreece

iLiketoEat wrote :

So the main point is that is causes a slight performance increase that's minuscule and really doesn't justify the price difference? So it would be better to get a better card than it is to get a higher RAM version?



Correct; considering there's an $80 premium for the 2GB version, you'd be better off getting either the 1GB version, or a better card (the 2GB version starts to creep into the 5870's price point).

Reply to pepperman

jerreece wrote :

Eyefinity with 3 x 1920x1080 monitors as an example. With a typical high res monitor the memory difference wouldn't matter anyhow.



when you look at the benchmarks between the 58501GB and 2GB; the FPS gap from 1280x1024 (around 2-3FPS) actually closed as you moved up to 2560x1600 (1FPS to dead even). The added pixels at each increased resolution only closed the tiny gap to one of 1% (aka dead even). So at 3 x 1920x1080, the demands would lower the gap even more. Less then 1%. The 2GB on the 5850 is clearly wasted unless playing Crysis at 17FPS is worth the extra money over 16FPS.

http://www.overclockersclub.com/re [...] _2gb/8.htm

or the other end of the spectrum with RE5 at 57FPS rather then 56FPS.

http://www.overclockersclub.com/re [...] 2gb/13.htm

------------------------------ defeating idiot fan boys since 2008.
Reply to ct1615

This topic has been closed by Mousemonkey

------------------------------ http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/3995/bl11.gif
Reply to Mousemonkey
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > [Solved] Different Manufacturers
Go to:

There are 2117 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Graphics Card Help for a Casual
By geofelt, 2 hours ago:

As a standard, a pci-e x16 graphics card slot can deliver up to 75w to a graphics card...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts