I woke up this morning to a very scary experience.
My 1 TB WD Elements HDD was now being recognized as RAW instead of NTFS, and I could not access the stuff of it. Luckily that harddrive was only for obsolete stuff, so nothing of value was lost - luckily.
Afterwards I have been able to successfully reformat my harddrive as NTFS and disc- and reconnect it, both from the computer and from the powersource, and its still reading as NTFS now.
So I'm thinking my drive is OK, but:
I tried to run a harddisk health monitoring tool to see how it was faring.
Its telling me that my harddrive health is bad due to the S.M.A.R.T value "Reallocated sectors count" being bad.. Here is an image of it: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/13685979/Hdd_External.png
I read a bit on the net, before asking here... I could see that I generally shouldn't be worried because of values such as the Start/Stop Count.
I now humbly ask you none the less, which knows more about it than I do. Is there any need for me to change my harddisks, based on what you see - is their demise close? Or is it just perhaps going to run a bit slower or something? Could I keep going with them and save a bit money, or is it time to change the harddives if I want to now my stuff is more safely stored?
Yea, I know about backup, and do have a 50gb dropbox for my most important stuff But lets face it, one does not want to loose even his less important or even obsolete stuff, if unavoidable It's only obsolete till its needed again, but its not that important that I want to have 2x harddrives to have a backup (although its important enough to not store on a sure to die harddrive)
Thanks a real lot!!!
Your answers is most appreciated!
Sorry I could not keep even a simple question short...
No one is going to be able to predict the life of your drives. The SMART feature is basically the best notification you will get as to predicting a drive is going to die. People ask here fairly often, "Is this SMART status right and should I really replace it" there is not an exact science to it, but that's the best system manufactures have come up with and should be taken as such imo. Personally I wouldn't use either of those drives if I didn't want to lose the data on them.
"But lets face it, one does not want to loose even his less important or even obsolete stuff, if unavoidable It's only obsolete till its needed again, but its not that important that I want to have 2x harddrives to have a backup (although its important enough to not store on a sure to die harddrive) "
This is a judgement call, if you're alright taking that risk then keep using the drive, and if/when it dies just accept it and move on.
If the drives are under warranty get them replaced while you still can, the manufacture of your laptop likely has a drive test you would run on it as well which may give you more info.
The Seagate drive has one "pending" sector and a high Reallocation Event Count, so that would be a cause for concern. However, there are no reallocated sectors as yet.
The high Start/Stop Count and Load/Unload Cycle Count suggests that the APM setting is too aggressive. Although the Start/Stop Count (16) has dropped below its threshold (20), thus triggering CrystalDiskInfo's "BAD" diagnosis, this attribute is still only a wear-and-tear indicator rather than a critical health indicator.
The actual number of start/stop cycles is ...
0x15186 = 86406
The total Power-On Hours is 5376, so this means that the drive is parking its heads every ...