Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
Hi,
Does anyone have pointers to a comparison between the Pentium M and the
Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M.
A comparison with AMD Sempron would be helpful as well, but the XP-M is
touted for its low power consumption, so I'm guessing that it I would prefer
it
to the Sempron.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
"Ed" <no@thanks.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Does anyone have pointers to a comparison between the Pentium M and the
>Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M.
>
>A comparison with AMD Sempron would be helpful as well, but the XP-M is
>touted for its low power consumption, so I'm guessing that it I would prefer
>it
>to the Sempron.
>
>Thanks,
>Ed
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
"Ed" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message news:41ae4f73$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com...
| Hi,
|
| Does anyone have pointers to a comparison between the Pentium M and the
| Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M.
|
| A comparison with AMD Sempron would be helpful as well, but the XP-M is
| touted for its low power consumption, so I'm guessing that it I would
prefer
| it
| to the Sempron.
|
| Thanks,
| Ed
|
The mobile sempron is only 25W and basically a A64 with less cache and the
extra 32-bit extensions castrated. They are all socket 754. It would be a
much better bet than the XP-M from a performance and power standpoint
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.