Not if you used RAID 0. RAID 0 is striping, not mirroring, and provides no redundancy. It actually makes your data more likely to be lost, because if a single disk dies, the entire array is ruined.
If you want redundancy, go with RAID 1. With 4 disks, you have other options as well, like RAID 5, which will stripe your data and keep parity information for redundancy. Best of both worlds. You can also get exotic with stuff like RAID 10, but I think RAID 5 would be your best bet if you're looking for redundancy.
It's worth noting that rebuilding arrays with failed disks takes a very, very long time. Much longer than a system restore or restore from backup. It only gets worse as you add more disks to the array, as well. If you're just looking for a way to make your system hardened against disk failure, I think standard backup technology is absolutely the way to go. RAID's redundancy is really all about protecting data you absolutely can't afford to lose, and can't afford to have downtime on. If you don't need this, you don't need RAID.