Hello all,
I've been looking around for a few days now for an upgrade to an old wireless adapter. I'm considering going with a wireless N adapter, but it seems one of the constant complaints I'm hearing across reviews (over many products) is that the signal strength is poor. I understand that there are a lot of factors that go into this (not listing them for the sake of brevity), but similarly I've seen cases where the reported distance/interference levels did not seem to warrant the signal strengths reported. Furthermore, it seems that in many cases wireless G seems to have a consistently good strength. This got me thinking of whether or not there may be some kinks still being worked out of the N implementations, and was wondering if anyone really knows anything that can shed some light on the idea. Thanks!
I've been looking around for a few days now for an upgrade to an old wireless adapter. I'm considering going with a wireless N adapter, but it seems one of the constant complaints I'm hearing across reviews (over many products) is that the signal strength is poor. I understand that there are a lot of factors that go into this (not listing them for the sake of brevity), but similarly I've seen cases where the reported distance/interference levels did not seem to warrant the signal strengths reported. Furthermore, it seems that in many cases wireless G seems to have a consistently good strength. This got me thinking of whether or not there may be some kinks still being worked out of the N implementations, and was wondering if anyone really knows anything that can shed some light on the idea. Thanks!