Restore or Last Known Good Configuration?

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.configuration_manage (More info?)

Hi

'Last Known Good Configuration' will replace the Registry and System Restore
will restore the Registry + other system files. LKGC does work to access
Windows a lot of the time, so trying that first is a good idea. Also, that
option doesn't take as long as System Restore to perform as it doesn't
restore as many files

--

Will Denny
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
Please reply to the News Groups


"CK" <cmkodai@(donttypethis)direcway.com> wrote in message
news:evCJZ4oiFHA.2180@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Which is the best to do first? I am assuming the Last Known Config is. I
> belong to a non pc Forum and sometimes the members will ask about their PC
> problems. I am seeing the advice of restoring being given a lot. This is
> frustrating me because that seems like a more drastic step then going with
> the Last Known config first. What is the best step to take first?
>
> CK

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.configuration_manage (More info?)

That's true. I have learnt a lot from this.
"Sharon F" <sharonfDEL@ETEmvps.org>
??????:%23eXLbptiFHA.1044@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:12:11 -0700, CK wrote:
>
>> Which is the best to do first? I am assuming the Last Known Config is. I
>> belong to a non pc Forum and sometimes the members will ask about their
>> PC
>> problems. I am seeing the advice of restoring being given a lot. This is
>> frustrating me because that seems like a more drastic step then going
>> with
>> the Last Known config first. What is the best step to take first?
>>
>> CK
>
> In addition to what Will has posted:
>
> Probably the main reason that you see System Restore referred to more
> often
> is that LKGC has a very small window of time where it's effective and then
> only under the condition that Windows does not boot successfully. Once
> Windows boots successfully (with or without problems), the data for LKGC
> is
> updated. By the time a problem gets posted here, it is very likely that
> LKGC is no longer a viable option.
>
> Theoretically and as documented in the XP Resource Kit, booting to Safe
> Mode (vs a normal startup) should not disturb the data set for LKGC. In
> other words, you could try a Safe Mode boot and even if it is successful
> you'd still have LKGC as an option.
>
> However, there are those of the opinion that this does not hold true. They
> state that booting to Safe Mode will update LKGC. Personally, I've had the
> opportunity (if failure to boot could be called that) to use LKGC once in
> all the years that I've had Windows XP. So haven't been able to prove or
> disprove either stance: MS documentation versus perceived experiences of
> other users.
>
> --
> Sharon F
> MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.configuration_manage (More info?)

Depends what's wrong. Some general info. Looking in;
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Select
you'll find the D_Word values for
"Current"=dword:00000001
"Default"=dword:00000001
"Failed"=dword:00000000
"LastKnownGood"=dword:00000002

CurrentControlSet is volatile and will always be an image (at boot) of
what's defined in ControlSetx where x = the value of "Current"

Choosing last known good boots the system with the control set that last
successfully booted your system. Control sets contain system configuration
information such as device drivers and services.


--
Regards,

Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

"CK" wrote:
| Which is the best to do first? I am assuming the Last Known Config is. I
| belong to a non pc Forum and sometimes the members will ask about their PC
| problems. I am seeing the advice of restoring being given a lot. This is
| frustrating me because that seems like a more drastic step then going with
| the Last Known config first. What is the best step to take first?
|
| CK
|
|