wa1 Splendid Mar 16, 2009 7,868 1 31,460 Dec 3, 2010 #2 Core 2 Quad right? Maybe this one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115041 Upvote 0 Downvote
jsc Champion Jul 14, 2004 16,893 6 52,960 Dec 3, 2010 #3 Balancing cost against performance, that is certainly the most cost effective. For .17 GHz more, the 9650 was about $350 the last I heard. And the QX's are really expensive. Upvote 0 Downvote
Balancing cost against performance, that is certainly the most cost effective. For .17 GHz more, the 9650 was about $350 the last I heard. And the QX's are really expensive.
strangestranger Splendid Jan 31, 2006 4,675 0 22,860 Dec 3, 2010 #4 No need to shout... Anyway the Processor linked to above is good enough, been running my own one fine. Get a nice cooler and you're good to go. However, best provide specs to make sure of no mistakes. Upvote 0 Downvote
No need to shout... Anyway the Processor linked to above is good enough, been running my own one fine. Get a nice cooler and you're good to go. However, best provide specs to make sure of no mistakes.
spentshells Judicious Apr 1, 2006 8,556 294 33,990 Dec 3, 2010 #5 the best one ? QX6700 is likely the best price/performance Upvote 0 Downvote