Phoenixlight :
It lets you clearly see how good a CPU is because it doesn't base it's results on a few benchmarks. It uses thousands to create a fair overview of the performance of each CPU.
But that on it's own makes it worthless. Viewing each 1000 benchmark individually is useful, but looking at some kind of "final score" is useless. Will the User be video encoding or any of those other random things included in the benchmark? The User is gaming.
1055t is the most bang for buck CPU you can get if you overclock, i would look int one.
I agree with this statement. However, the 955 black edition can usually make it to 3.8GHz, which isn't far off and it will be significantly less expensive.
None of the games mentioned will make good use of the 6 cores of the phenom II x6. Crysis can only use two cores. That's why in today's world, quad cores are the best gaming option. 3 cores on a budget.
In my opinion, there are only 3 best gaming chips on the market:
Core i5 760/750 $205/180. I don't know of a game that can use hyperthreading. Even if one could, I don't know of a game that seems to make efficient use of more than 4 threads. If you want more per core CPU power and don't overclock though, you'll have to go the i7 route.
Phenom IIx4 955/945. $145/135 The 965 and 970 are too pricey for their performance. But at $50 less than the 760/750, these CPUs can handle a lot. Most people don't need more than this anyway unless they have a top end card or a crossfire/SLI setup.
Athlon IIx3 ~$75 Although more and more games can use 4 cores, a LOT of games can still only use 2-3 cores. It may not have L3 cache but it has a high clockspeed. I don't recommend less than 3 cores for gaming unless you are on a super budget.
I would include the phenom IIx3 but they are hard to find, expensive when you can find them, and are always OEM.
The radeon 4890 is a decent card and if it were me, I would go for the 955 BE. Not much benefit could come from going any higher with that video card. GTA4 and SC2 can make use of all 4 cores.