G
Guest
Guest
Hi everyone,
I am planning to build a PC for home, which is going to be mainly used for playing some small games, word processing, surfing, transferring movies & images from Digital Cams (maybe a bit of editing at times), downloading, etc.
I want to have a system which supports at-least two monitors, though I would like to add a graphics card if possible in this budget but wouldn't mind to postpone it for later.
To this effect I am confused whether it would be advisable to have a motherboard with dual monitor support for now and add up a graphics card later on
OR
To go with non graphical motherboard and add a cheap graphics card for now and upgrade it later. I must admit that I am not sure if there are motherboards without inbuilt graphic support.
My main concern would be to future proof the system to some extent, maybe something like 3-5 years. I have a Windows 7 Home (32 bit) which I would like to use but its not a limiting factor as I am willing to move on to 64 bit OS in future.
Budget: $400
Usage (Current): Playing Windows Games, Microsoft Office, Browsing Internet, Movie & Image Transfer, Downloading etc.
Usage (Future): Surfing Internet, Visual Studio, AutoCAD, Share Trading, Gaming (Eg; Civilization)
Approximate Purchase Date: In a fortnight.
Parts Not Required: Keyboard, Mouse, Monitor, Speakers, HDD, Optical Drive.
Parts Preferences: None as such, but would want to try AMD for a change.
Overclocking: Maybe
SLI or Crossfire: Maybe
I am new to this so may have missed out on something, please advise.
Hoping to be guided in the right direction.
Regards.
I am planning to build a PC for home, which is going to be mainly used for playing some small games, word processing, surfing, transferring movies & images from Digital Cams (maybe a bit of editing at times), downloading, etc.
I want to have a system which supports at-least two monitors, though I would like to add a graphics card if possible in this budget but wouldn't mind to postpone it for later.
To this effect I am confused whether it would be advisable to have a motherboard with dual monitor support for now and add up a graphics card later on
OR
To go with non graphical motherboard and add a cheap graphics card for now and upgrade it later. I must admit that I am not sure if there are motherboards without inbuilt graphic support.
My main concern would be to future proof the system to some extent, maybe something like 3-5 years. I have a Windows 7 Home (32 bit) which I would like to use but its not a limiting factor as I am willing to move on to 64 bit OS in future.
Budget: $400
Usage (Current): Playing Windows Games, Microsoft Office, Browsing Internet, Movie & Image Transfer, Downloading etc.
Usage (Future): Surfing Internet, Visual Studio, AutoCAD, Share Trading, Gaming (Eg; Civilization)
Approximate Purchase Date: In a fortnight.
Parts Not Required: Keyboard, Mouse, Monitor, Speakers, HDD, Optical Drive.
Parts Preferences: None as such, but would want to try AMD for a change.
Overclocking: Maybe
SLI or Crossfire: Maybe
I am new to this so may have missed out on something, please advise.
Hoping to be guided in the right direction.
Regards.