Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Closed

Why core i

Tags:
  • CPUs
  • Core
  • Microsoft
Last response: in CPUs
Share
December 20, 2010 1:52:19 PM

why has Microsoft suddenly stopped shipping core 2 series ?

what is the reason of launching the core i series?

is core i series not the same cereal with a different name?

More about : core

a c 78 à CPUs
December 20, 2010 3:03:55 PM

The Core i7, i5, i3 are the replacement's of the E.O.L. LGA 775 socket with the once new LGA 1366 (Core i7) and LGA 1156 (Core i7, i5, & i3). These are new platforms / architecture and different from the previous Core 2 series. In January, Intel is getting ready to release an even newer platform / architecture with their Sandy Bridge CPU's (LGA 1155)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_775

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1366

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1156

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1155
Score
0
December 20, 2010 3:27:01 PM

Intel*. Microsoft don't make semiconductors etc. (their hardware is crap anyway)
core + core 2 are a "spin off" from the original Pentium 4 design, Core i is based on the original P4 as they have can have hyperthreading etc. Core 2 cannot.
Score
0
Related resources

Best solution

a c 231 à CPUs
December 20, 2010 3:37:39 PM

CsG_kieran_2 said:
Intel*. Microsoft don't make semiconductors etc. (their hardware is crap anyway)
core + core 2 are a "spin off" from the original Pentium 4 design, Core i is based on the original P4 as they have can have hyperthreading etc. Core 2 cannot.


Right on the intel not microsoft part, very wrong on where the architectures are from. The Pentium 4 was Netburst Architecture, it had long pipelines so it did pretty good as long as the prediction was good, later ones got hyper threading added on, the Core 2 series is based on the Core Architecture, its not closely related to the pentium 4 and does multiple cores much better. The new Core i series has a couple different architectures but is very different from the pentium 4, all of the Core i's have an integrated memory controller, a much different core layout, and much high IPC rating than any previous processor, the fact that they sport hyper threading doesnt make them similar to the P4's, they just have the second set of registers to do it with to boost their IPCs even higher, hyper threading was not part of the P4 architecture, its a concept all its own and theoretically can be added to any architecture, but it isnt often as it adds more transistors which add more heat and relies on the core being fast enough to have some down time that something else can execute in.
Share
December 20, 2010 3:48:12 PM

^Geez i was staying off the technical stuff with the guy. I was not weighting all that lol
What i ment was thye share a lot of the same "ideas" so to speak. Sorry about that i should have layed that out a bit better :( 
Score
0
December 20, 2010 10:38:17 PM

Best answer selected by capital_one.
Score
0
a b à CPUs
December 21, 2010 6:55:14 AM

This topic has been closed by Maziar
Score
0
!