Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

1600*900 & 1600*1200 DIFFERENT FPS???

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
August 15, 2010 5:40:41 AM

If i run 1600*900&1600*1200 in a same system in same graphics (everything equal) then these two produce different fps? What do you think?

More about : 1600 900 1600 1200 fps

a b U Graphics card
August 15, 2010 5:45:47 AM

Yes. 1600x900 is a lower resolution and thus will produce slightly higher fps since it is less taxing on your system.
Related resources
August 15, 2010 5:56:08 AM

The lower resolution will speed up your fps but it will not look as sharp as the higher resolution. That and the higher res gives you more screen "real-estate".
a c 175 U Graphics card
August 15, 2010 6:27:44 AM

Duh? There are less pixels to render at 1600x900, so it should provide more FPS. Its close to 1600x1200 so it won't be radically faster, but it should be slightly faster.

I'd be careful to claim "sharper" cobra. 1600x900 is the new 16:9 resolution while 1600x1200 is an older 4:3. The new 16:9 screen might look a lot better then an old 4:3 monitor.
a c 376 U Graphics card
August 15, 2010 7:22:29 AM

1600x1200 has 33.3% more pixels than 1600x900. The difference in performance should be similar.
a b U Graphics card
August 15, 2010 8:28:39 AM

Are you sure?
Are you sure?

was he sure? of course he is.

multiply 1600 by 900 and compare it to the product of 1600 and 1200. i hope you get the picture.
a b U Graphics card
August 15, 2010 9:31:18 AM

Dibakar1236 said:
Are you sure?

Lol.. :lol:  Of course he is!!
a b U Graphics card
August 15, 2010 9:35:37 AM

this.... this can't be serious...

please say this is a troll?...
August 15, 2010 12:12:32 PM

If u have a powerful video card u will not notice the difference and a cpu which is bottlenecking.btw which card u use.

i am using xfx 5750 hd