I have a system I built last year that I want to reconfigure. FWIW, the motherboard has a Z68 chipset. Please understand that I know just enough to be dangerous, so type slowly and I can follow along, with the help of Google where necessary.
The issue that is motivating me to rethink my setup is that I run Windows 7 and I want to be able to run Linux as well, and just use Windows when there is no easy solution in Linux. So, Linux will become my primary OS. I have to reconfigure because Linux hates my RAID arrays, which are run off of the onboard motherboard RAID controller. The linux people tell me that onboard RAID is a hoax. I don't quite understand why, but I've heard it enough times that I'm starting to believe it.
Right now, I have a 64GB SSD, and two 2TB drives. My idea is to confine the OS and applications to a single hard drive and put all my data files on another one. I'm paranoid about losing data after having a hard drive get corrupted some years ago and losing a bunch of data.
Right now I have all my data files being protected via the on board "Fake RAID" in a RAID 1 configuration.
I'm thinking that I can got a 256GB SSD and use that for my Windows installation and applications. I can repurpose the 64GB SSD to be the linux drive. All data files will continue to live on the 2TB drives and I want to keep those backed up. I also want to access that data from both OSes.
So I have these options to achieve this auto backup:
RAID --either RAID 1 or RAID 5 (I will buy a 3rd 2TB drive if I have to)
Forget about RAID altogether, set up 2 distinct volumes, and use a file syncing tool to run every day and back up the files.
If I go for RAID, it has to be true hardware RAID that will play nice with Ubuntu and other linux distributions.
So, do I make the "data" volume external or keep it internal?
My motherboard does not have an eSATA port on it so I'd have to buy a separate card + hardware RAID-enabled enclosure for that.
If I keep everything internal, I will still need a RAID controller card, yes?
I really don't ever see me having to move my 2TB drives around, so I may as well keep them internal if possible and if it keeps data transfer speeds up or saves money.
The 2TB drives are SATA III drives and it seems that eSATA is slower than that, so going external may introduce a bottleneck.
I do a little bit of everything on my computer -- editing hi-res images, some video editing, audio editing and so forth.
So my questions:
Use RAID or file sync utility?
If RAID -- external or internal?
Depending on that, what hardware do I have to buy to make it linux-friendly RAID and avoid the "fake RAID" issues?
I'm open to suggestions and remember to type slowly so I can follow along. Thank you.
The issue that is motivating me to rethink my setup is that I run Windows 7 and I want to be able to run Linux as well, and just use Windows when there is no easy solution in Linux. So, Linux will become my primary OS. I have to reconfigure because Linux hates my RAID arrays, which are run off of the onboard motherboard RAID controller. The linux people tell me that onboard RAID is a hoax. I don't quite understand why, but I've heard it enough times that I'm starting to believe it.
Right now, I have a 64GB SSD, and two 2TB drives. My idea is to confine the OS and applications to a single hard drive and put all my data files on another one. I'm paranoid about losing data after having a hard drive get corrupted some years ago and losing a bunch of data.
Right now I have all my data files being protected via the on board "Fake RAID" in a RAID 1 configuration.
I'm thinking that I can got a 256GB SSD and use that for my Windows installation and applications. I can repurpose the 64GB SSD to be the linux drive. All data files will continue to live on the 2TB drives and I want to keep those backed up. I also want to access that data from both OSes.
So I have these options to achieve this auto backup:
RAID --either RAID 1 or RAID 5 (I will buy a 3rd 2TB drive if I have to)
Forget about RAID altogether, set up 2 distinct volumes, and use a file syncing tool to run every day and back up the files.
If I go for RAID, it has to be true hardware RAID that will play nice with Ubuntu and other linux distributions.
So, do I make the "data" volume external or keep it internal?
My motherboard does not have an eSATA port on it so I'd have to buy a separate card + hardware RAID-enabled enclosure for that.
If I keep everything internal, I will still need a RAID controller card, yes?
I really don't ever see me having to move my 2TB drives around, so I may as well keep them internal if possible and if it keeps data transfer speeds up or saves money.
The 2TB drives are SATA III drives and it seems that eSATA is slower than that, so going external may introduce a bottleneck.
I do a little bit of everything on my computer -- editing hi-res images, some video editing, audio editing and so forth.
So my questions:
Use RAID or file sync utility?
If RAID -- external or internal?
Depending on that, what hardware do I have to buy to make it linux-friendly RAID and avoid the "fake RAID" issues?
I'm open to suggestions and remember to type slowly so I can follow along. Thank you.