Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > ATI Radeon 6000 seriers rumor to be released in october

ATI Radeon 6000 seriers rumor to be released in october

Forum Graphics & Displays : Graphics Cards ATI Radeon 6000 seriers rumor to be released in october

Page:    Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
   Go to page :
 

http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumou [...] /9688.html

Quote :

Popular Turkish website Donanimhaber has released an expected schedule for the release of ATI's Radeon HD 6000 series. The first HD 6000 GPU to be released will be the Radeon HD 6700 series, codenamed Barts. The HD 6700 is scheduled for a release as early as October. As suggested by the nomenclature, the HD 6700 will directly replace the HD 5700 series.

The HD 6700 release will be followed up by Cayman in November, expected to be branded as the ATI Radeon HD 6800 series, replacing the current HD 5800 series.

The flagship will be Antilles, and branded as the ATI Radeon HD 6970. Antilles, as expected, will be a dual-GPU Cayman. While the HD 5970 lowers clock speeds from the HD 5870, HD 6970 is expected to feature the same clock speeds as the HD 6870 - basically a HD 6870 in CF. This will be much like the HD 4870 X2. The Radeon HD 6970 is scheduled for December.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2290908.png
Register or log in to remove.

In one of the news i read in xbitlabs's site, they mentioned that there isn't a huge difference in performance between HD 5xxx and 6xxx series, the main difference is in their power consumption, which the new cards are said to have less power consumption.

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar

Yes, I've been following this topic vigourously seeing as im going to be upgrading my graphics card this year, from 9800GT -> 6850? or 5890? although depending on pricing I may choose to buy a 5870? I won't need UVD for a good while nor will I be doing eyefinity so if there isn't alot of upgrades in features to the new series I may stick with the old lot.

Depending on performance, pricing and TDP I could be swayed etheir way, At the moment however I think I'll be going for a MSi hawk/Asus DirectCU/HIS OC? maybe

Can't wait for nov.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/1358167.png

Currently awaiting the official release of the ATi Radeon 6xxx series official specifications and verified benchmarks
Reply to decode

I read that the 6700 would need 2 6 pin connectors and would support a new eyefinity called eyefinity 4 which you could probably guess is support for 4 monitors.
Cant see how that would equal better/less power consumption. Of course the article i read could have been mixing up the cards as its not exactly crystal yet is it.

Mactronix

Reply to mactronix

dose any one know if this card is going to be 40nm or the next step down? If they are going to release the card as a lower powered card then could that mean that they are shrinking the die to 30nm or so?

Wish I could have waited before I got the 5870 but my other card the 4850 was starting to die and I wanted DX 11


Message edited by blackpanther26 on 08-28-2010 at 12:31:04 PM
------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2290908.png
Reply to blackpanther26

The way i heard it was that these SI cards are coming out because there was an issue with the 32nm fabrication process and these will be a 40nm stop gap refresh untill the NI cards come out next year.

Mactronix

Reply to mactronix

can't wait to see the benchmarks in october and november

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2290908.png
Reply to blackpanther26

and that's why for the time being i settled for gtx 460 first... wait till the end of the year to see what outcome will be...

Reply to phenom90

Quote :

whats actually is refresh?Do manufractures just crank up the card specification and call it a refresh.



same architecture, smaller die process or some process improvement, much like the gf104 and the 4890/4770.

not to be confused with the term rebadge by nvidia. where the very same chip gets a brand new sticker on top of it (example: 8800gs -> 9600gso, 9800gtx+ -> gts250) and marketed as new.

Reply to wh3resmycar

wh3resmycar wrote :

same architecture, smaller die process or some process improvement, much like the gf104 and the 4890/4770.

not to be confused with the term rebadge by nvidia. where the very same chip gets a brand new sticker on top of it (example: 8800gs -> 9600gso, 9800gtx+ -> gts250) and marketed as new.



Haha making fun of nVidia, one of my favorite things, I also like long walks on the beach :lol:

Can't wait for SI. the anticipation has been killing me since I found out a month or so ago.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/1358167.png

Currently awaiting the official release of the ATi Radeon 6xxx series official specifications and verified benchmarks
Reply to decode

someone put up leaked benches a while ago. As many people expected it had about a 25-30% increase in performance across the board, which considering its still 40nm isnt bad. That would put the 6870 above the gtx 480 in performance. Hopefully the tesselation will be improved on the 6xxx series. But until we get 100% legit benches who knows. I'd buy a 6870 or two for xfire if they do have a 30% perf increase over the 5870, to replace my gtx 295. However i am saving for bulldozer and a new mobo, and im not sitting on a bank :/

------------------------------ *AMD Phenom II x4 955 BE
*8 gigs OCZ gold amd ddr3 1600
*Nvidia Geforce 295 GTX
*Creative SB X-Fi xtreme gamer
Reply to yannifb

I wish I could have waited but I needed a new card so I got the ATI Radeon 5870. but hey when the 6000 series comes out I can get another 5870 for cheaper and crossfire it.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2290908.png
Reply to blackpanther26

I'm hoping for some serious improvements in crossfire scaling. The GTX 4xx series has such good scaling that it makes it hard for me to look elsewhere since I don't upgrade regularly so a dual card setup is likely to happen at some point.

I want to see at least a little more performance, better tessellation, and better crossfire scaling

------------------------------ Want Rock and Metal?

Paul Online Radio Network: http://www.paulradio.net/
Reply to AMW1011

but there are rumors said that the hd 6000 series will not have a significant improvement in performance compared to hd 5000 series... so i don't understand what's the selling point for hd 6000 series?? also if i go for ati i would only stick with single gpu as their cfirex scaling is poor than sli....

Reply to phenom90

phenom90 wrote :

but there are rumors said that the hd 6000 series will not have a significant improvement in performance compared to hd 5000 series... so i don't understand what's the selling point for hd 6000 series?? also if i go for ati i would only stick with single gpu as their cfirex scaling is poor than sli....



Depends on what you consider significant. So far it seems like it'll be a good 20-30% across the board, which is definitely important, it's just not the HUGE MAJOR MUST-HAVE like a new gen. often is. And Crossfire scaling is close to SLI, and very good (esp. if you consider where SLI/CF were just a few years ago.)

Reply to Dekasav

if 20 - 30 % for me it seems very much... that should make it a good buy...

Reply to phenom90

I'm looking at a 6850, Comparable to a 5870 at stock I expect, but with a new feature-set, I will then possibly? Overclock, although I don't think it will be necessary


Message edited by decode on 08-31-2010 at 12:59:02 PM
Reply to decode

hd 5850?? then you should wait some more time before grab one as ati will drop its prices on hd 5000 series prior to the release of hd 6000 series... damn sure you don't want to buy now and two months later its price lower so much....

Reply to phenom90

I've corrected my comment, I meant a 6850. However depending upon pricing I may be swayed to buy a 5870 when the price drop comes, I'm not too certain, Either way its a massive upgrade from my 9800GT, but atleast with a 6850 it has newer features and I get bragging rights ;)

Reply to decode

Anything coming out in the HD5970 area? But i think that would not make sense. The HD5970 is a powerful card in itself and improving on t would only eat into its limited customer base.

Reply to hell_storm2004

Yes, there's expected to be a 6970 and 6950, The 6950 isn't expected to be released until the 6970 actually gets competition however (this is the same case as the 5xxx series but seeing as theres no competition for the 5970 theres no need to release a 5950)

The 6970 is effectively going to be 2x 5870's on a single PCB according to what I've heard.

Reply to decode

for the time being there are so little info about hd 6000 series even its going to the market later this year... i don't knw hw gud 6850 will be but i assume it should be better if not alot better than hd 5000 series... i'm also eyeing the hd 6000 series....
despite just purchased a gtx 460 1gb recently.... this card is really bang for buck!!!!
just hopefully when the hd 6000 series is out... there will be less driver issues with that series....

Reply to phenom90

Yes, as we all hope.
However the current benchmarks released (assumed 5870) suggest a 25~30% increase of performance at stock(assumed again)

But for all we know it could be a 5850 benchmark? that would be awesome!

Reply to decode

if 6850 can be better than 5870 while still maintaining the hd 5850 tdp... this card will be damn rock!!!

Reply to phenom90

Nvidia are staring down a barrel if this is true.

 

http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-1500103-1-1.html

 
Quote :

But, can it play Crysis? At Very High, 1920x1200, 4x AA, the HD 6870 comfortably plays along at 43.55 fps. The minimum fps is 29.57. Crysis has been well and truly conquered at HD resolutions with high IQ settings. At these kind of settings, previous single GPU cards barely broke 30 fps average, which means the HD 6870's minimum framerate is the same as the average of HD 5870 / GTX 480.

 

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/7441/crysiss.jpg


Message edited by bobdozer on 08-29-2010 at 09:52:47 PM
Reply to bobdozer

Im still waiting a few more days, then we will know

------------------------------ If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening
Reply to JAYDEEJOHN

JAYDEEJOHN wrote :

Im still waiting a few more days, then we will know



Whats happening in a few days?

Reply to bobdozer

Word is, we will know alot more. Leaks are a comin

------------------------------ If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening
Reply to JAYDEEJOHN

If those benches are real, its not a dual card, they arent the first cards out, they always come later

------------------------------ If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening
Reply to JAYDEEJOHN

Nice. If these numbers are real, then it's actually great, considering that there will be a lot of performance upgrades through new drivers. I'm still curious about DX11 and tesselation performance.

Reply to unknown_13

Some other leaks show it being ATLEAST 33% faster than the 5870...up to 20% faster than the 480.

------------------------------ I havent had AMD driver problems since 10.7...and 9.3 before that ;)
Reply to ares1214

This next topics has been merged by Mousemonkey

  • New 6870 benchmarks.

------------------------------ http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/3995/bl11.gif
Reply to Mousemonkey

http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=26184

http://img.hexus.net/v2/pmason/ati/6000/gpuz.jpg

Possible 6870? Seems within reason. Interestingly enough, the memory bandwidth is actually a greater increase over the 5870, than the 5870 was over the 4870. 5870 was 153 GB/s, 4870 was 115 GB/s. This shows this possible 6870 at over 200 GB/s, for a 33% increase over the 5870. This is within the realm of reason, however id believe maybe 25% more easily. If its true though, very promising for AMD. For those who failed in math, 4870 to 5870 was 30% increase. Might be a fake, but who knows.

------------------------------ I havent had AMD driver problems since 10.7...and 9.3 before that ;)
Reply to ares1214

How many times are people going to post the same GPuz shot?

------------------------------ http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/3995/bl11.gif
Reply to Mousemonkey

This next topics has been merged by Mousemonkey

  • 6870 Benchmark?

------------------------------ http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/3995/bl11.gif
Reply to Mousemonkey

Nah im not buying it, I'm thinking its marketing BS to try and stop people falling on the ever improving GTX 460. Everyone who knows anything has been saying that we wont get too much performance boost and then here we are with a card showing huge numbers, convenient isn't it :D

Mactronix

Reply to mactronix

Nothing can be decided till the final card is released into the market. Wait till guru3d and AnandTech review it.

Reply to hell_storm2004

if 6870 is really that fast as showed in the leaked benchmark.... i think i know what my next card is.... but still... i don't believe it will be this good... just wait more info from amd....

Reply to phenom90

If those leaked benchmarks are right, the 6000 series will rock. Once again, Nvidia is in serious trouble. I just bought a 5850 three months ago, so I will probably pass on the 6000 cards. The 5850 should be good for another year or two.

Reply to Glacier

Yes, If nvidia can only get there last generation finaly rolled out at the start of ATI next generation they really are screwed, Considering the last ATI generation is still pretty kickass...

Reply to decode

Maybe they stepped up a gear seeing that how GTX460 is eating into the market.

Reply to hell_storm2004

Glacier wrote :

If those leaked benchmarks are right, the 6000 series will rock. Once again, Nvidia is in serious trouble. I just bought a 5850 three months ago, so I will probably pass on the 6000 cards. The 5850 should be good for another year or two.



How do you work that then ? Do you know what the high end Nvidia cards will be ?
You need to remember that the Bandwidth doesn't really mean anything. The 4770 has 51.2 GB/sec and the 5670 has 64 GB/sec on the spec sheets but the 4770 is easily the faster card.
Even if those screen shots are legit then Nvidia are still ok the next top end card is rumoured to be a dual card and they can easily get a card with the same Gbs/sec without any power worries.
{edit for spelling}
Mactronix


Message edited by mactronix on 09-06-2010 at 10:24:46 AM
Reply to mactronix

True, but Nvidia won't get their next round of cards out until mid-2011. Meanwhile, ATI will be selling their 6000 cards like hot cakes. The same thing happend last year, with the 5000 series. If Nvidia doesn't pick up the pace, they will be on the losing end of this battle for years to come.

Reply to Glacier

Unless nVidia reduce the gap to 2-3 months or release something better before ATI does, they would again be eating ATI's dust for a while.

Reply to hell_storm2004

I read somewhere that some alleged benchmarks of ATI's Radeon HD 6870 show that is it actually faster than the HD 5970!

I find this hard to believe. Mainly because as far as to my knowledge, no testable Northern Island prototype exists yet. Whatever HD 6870 benchmark, assuming it's not fake, was probably the 40nm "Southern Island".

Maybe Two HD 6970's in CrossfireX can run Crysis on 2560x1600 with 8x AA and all the other graphics settings cranked as high as they can go, and we'll have 75+ FPS.

Reply to ambam
------------------------------ |CPU| i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz |MOBO| Rampage II |RAM| 12GB, 6*2Gig GSkill DDR3 |GPU| EVGA GTX 260 x2 SLI
|HDD| 300GB VelociRaptor + 2*1TB Caviar |Sound| X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty |PSU| Corsair 750TX
|Case| XCLIO A380BK |CPUCooling| Zalman CNPS 9000 |OS| Vista 64
Reply to Helltech

Got the benchmark link?

Oh and you spelt Metro 2033 with a 'C', 'r', 'y','s','i', and another 's'. :)

------------------------------ Core i7 3930K @ 4.6Ghz - 8GB 1866Mhz 7-9-7-24-1T - Gigabyte X79-UD3 - 1000W XFX Pro Platinum - Modded ATCS 840 - Custom Water - Corsair Force 3 120GB
Reply to omgitzfatal

omgitzfatal wrote :

Got the benchmark link?

Oh and you spelt Metro 2033 with a 'C', 'r', 'y','s','i', and another 's'. :)



Crysis graphically still looks better than Metro 2033, tesselation combined with extremely high resolutions are what kills the framerate in Metro.

It's also even more poorly coded than Crysis.

------------------------------ An infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number on typewriters, given an infinite number of time, would eventually print of the entire library of congress.
Reply to ambam

Just a joke man :) although some may argue that metro looks better than Crysis as its a matter of opinion. I think they both look great in there own way, and I would also say they are both badly coded.

Personally I think BFBC2 on Max looks very similar to Crysis on Max, though the frame rates are completely different. :)

------------------------------ Core i7 3930K @ 4.6Ghz - 8GB 1866Mhz 7-9-7-24-1T - Gigabyte X79-UD3 - 1000W XFX Pro Platinum - Modded ATCS 840 - Custom Water - Corsair Force 3 120GB
Reply to omgitzfatal
Register or log in to remove.
Previous
1 2 3 4 5 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > ATI Radeon 6000 seriers rumor to be released in october
Go to:

There are 1829 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Bad PCI-E Slot or Bad Graphics Card?
By smorizio, 1 hour ago:

check that you have all the power cables plugged into your video card..some have one some...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts