Hi,
I just bought a Dell XPS 9000, with 475W power supply, the graphic card is gt 220 1GB.
I tried to test the cuda support, and it seems to be there. I have a movie player software that allows to set CUDA mode, and I can see only GPU usage got increase. CPU stays idle.
However when I use Corel Video Studio X3, which supposely should have cuda support, I still feel it is not fast enough, I have turned on "hardware decoding".
I know GT 220 is a budget card, so I am wondering if I should switch up to a better card like GTS 250. But reading posts on this forum seems to indicating unless you go very high end, like GTX 285 you won't be able to leverage CUDA in video editing?
I have only 475W power supply so the best I can go is GTS 250, in terms of video editing, will it offer a much better performance than my GT 220? Do I need to get a 512M or 1G?
I am not a gamer so the only usage will be video editing, HD video playback and photo editing like PhotoShop.
Advises much appreciated!
Thanks!
I just bought a Dell XPS 9000, with 475W power supply, the graphic card is gt 220 1GB.
I tried to test the cuda support, and it seems to be there. I have a movie player software that allows to set CUDA mode, and I can see only GPU usage got increase. CPU stays idle.
However when I use Corel Video Studio X3, which supposely should have cuda support, I still feel it is not fast enough, I have turned on "hardware decoding".
I know GT 220 is a budget card, so I am wondering if I should switch up to a better card like GTS 250. But reading posts on this forum seems to indicating unless you go very high end, like GTX 285 you won't be able to leverage CUDA in video editing?
I have only 475W power supply so the best I can go is GTS 250, in terms of video editing, will it offer a much better performance than my GT 220? Do I need to get a 512M or 1G?
I am not a gamer so the only usage will be video editing, HD video playback and photo editing like PhotoShop.
Advises much appreciated!
Thanks!