G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 (More info?)

How many members of the Bush Administration are needed
to replace a lightbulb?

The Answer is SEVEN:

one to deny that a lightbulb needs to be replaced

one to attack and question the patriotism of anyone
who has questions about the lightbulb

one to blame the previous administration for the need
of a new lightbulb,

one to arrange the invasion of a country rumored to have
a secret stockpile of lightbulbs

one to get together with Vice President Cheney and figure out how to pay
Halliburton Industries one million dollars for a lightbulb

one to arrange a photo-op session showing Bush changing the lightbulb
while dressed in a flight suit and wrapped in an American flag,

and finally one to explain to Bush the difference between
screwing a lightbulb and screwing the country.
________________
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 (More info?)

"Szaki" <szaki10@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:pwBIc.64634$IQ4.42675@attbi_s02...
> How many members of the Bush Administration are needed
> to replace a lightbulb?
>
> The Answer is SEVEN:
>
> one to deny that a lightbulb needs to be replaced
>
> one to attack and question the patriotism of anyone
> who has questions about the lightbulb
>
> one to blame the previous administration for the need
> of a new lightbulb,
>
> one to arrange the invasion of a country rumored to have
> a secret stockpile of lightbulbs
>
> one to get together with Vice President Cheney and figure out how to pay
> Halliburton Industries one million dollars for a lightbulb
>
> one to arrange a photo-op session showing Bush changing the lightbulb
> while dressed in a flight suit and wrapped in an American flag,
>
> and finally one to explain to Bush the difference between
> screwing a lightbulb and screwing the country.
> ________________
>
>
>


roflmao ;o)

--

Margolis
http://web.archive.org/web/20030215212142/http://www.agqx.org/faqs/AGQ2FAQ.htm
http://www.unrealtower.org/faq
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 (More info?)

On 2004-07-13, Margolis <someone@somewhere.org> schrieb:

<snip joke>

> roflmao ;o)

I read a long time ago that some news servers have for want of a better phrase, a
'me too' filter. This would drop all posts that were just about 98% quoted
text, with a one-line reply tacked onto the bottom. Obviously SuperNews
don't. :/

Anybody know if this 'feature' exists at all ? And if you do, what servers
use it ? I'm sure it's not called a 'me too' filter, but hopefully you
understand what I mean.

Cordially,

Kleeb.
 

Andrew

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
2,439
0
19,780
Archived from groups: alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 (More info?)

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 21:04:16 GMT, Kleeb <Kleeb@kleeb.kleeb> wrote:

>Anybody know if this 'feature' exists at all ? And if you do, what servers
>use it ? I'm sure it's not called a 'me too' filter, but hopefully you
>understand what I mean.

I have never heard of one of those, but it is a damn good idea!
--
Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 (More info?)

On 2004-07-13, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost> schrieb:

> I have never heard of one of those, but it is a damn good idea!


That's what I thought. :) My (current) news provider doesn't seem to operate
one either, if indeed they really exist at all. Maybe it's more of a
client-side filtering option, I don't know.

Cordially,

Kleeb.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 (More info?)

"Kleeb" <Kleeb@kleeb.kleeb> wrote in message
news:k7YIc.1202$X06.572@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
>
> I read a long time ago that some news servers have for want of a better
phrase, a
> 'me too' filter. This would drop all posts that were just about 98% quoted
> text, with a one-line reply tacked onto the bottom. Obviously SuperNews
> don't. :/
>




Sorry, but I think that would be a mistake, worse than top posting. I
almost always edit out any posts but the one I am replying too. But if
somebody came and just saw my reply, without quoting what I was replying to,
they might just be confused.

sometimes a reply can be summed up in just one line, so does that mean I
can't reply unless I can come up with a verbose answer?

--

Margolis
http://web.archive.org/web/20030215212142/http://www.agqx.org/faqs/AGQ2FAQ.htm
http://www.unrealtower.org/faq
 

Andrew

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
2,439
0
19,780
Archived from groups: alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 (More info?)

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 07:08:55 -0500, "Margolis" <someone@somewhere.org>
wrote:

<load of inexplicably blank lines snipped>
>sometimes a reply can be summed up in just one line, so does that mean I
>can't reply unless I can come up with a verbose answer?

But with a 98% rule, a one line reply would only be killed if you
quote a stupidly large amount of text. A percentage of around 80%
would be more appropriate IMO.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.