Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Hp monitor with ati 5870

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
September 6, 2010 1:33:54 PM

Today I went to a lanshop and saw the Hp W1907. I thought its design was nice but i found out it was 19inch and could only run a resolution of 1440x990 max. I saw the W2207 version which i dun not like the turn 360 degree or 180 stuff idk. I just want a screen that can tilt up and down. So are there any similar HP monitors that tilt up and down, which can support 1920x1080 resolution? I spent so long researching and still could not find out..........

More about : monitor ati 5870

a b C Monitor
September 6, 2010 1:54:31 PM

Why HP, there's lots of good brands. Most HP are not for gaming but for photo editing and stuff. Almost all the monitors can tilt up/down.
m
0
l
September 6, 2010 2:03:52 PM

HP monitors are way to expensive for home use. They are cool though.

I would say for HD5970 and if you wanna spend a little money, go for Dell U2410.

Otherwise a cheaper option is ST2410. Looks for the specs of both on Dell's website.
m
0
l
Related resources
September 6, 2010 2:16:08 PM

The design of Hp w1907 just look so cool >.< but maybe i should stick with my first option BenQ v2220.
m
0
l
September 6, 2010 2:25:49 PM

For HD5870 you need a 24 incher man!
m
0
l
September 6, 2010 2:40:44 PM

hell_storm2004 said:
For HD5870 you need a 24 incher man!
Why? Isnt it alright with just a screen alittle smaller?Its still HD.Anyway whats a good gaming monitors ms?
m
0
l
September 6, 2010 2:57:39 PM

22 inches wont do justice to a HD5870.
m
0
l
September 7, 2010 12:09:55 AM

hell_storm2004 said:
22 inches wont do justice to a HD5870.


Ok but is 2-3ms slow for a gaming monitor or I will need a 5 ms one?
m
0
l
September 7, 2010 7:44:54 AM

If you check the specs carefully the normal TN panels have a response time of 2ms (G2G) and 5ms on the color. That is of course what maximum monitors offer on standard. For gaming, lower response time is better.
m
0
l
a b C Monitor
September 7, 2010 8:17:49 AM

progunnerboi said:
Ok but is 2-3ms slow for a gaming monitor or I will need a 5 ms one?


2-3ms is faster than 5ms! So technically 2-3 is better (you can't really tell a difference, but it is). :lol: 
m
0
l
September 7, 2010 9:09:53 AM

Helltech said:
2-3ms is faster than 5ms! So technically 2-3 is better (you can't really tell a difference, but it is). :lol: 

So far HP ones have 2-3 ms while those I saw b4 have 5ms. I will check dell out also.
m
0
l
!