First off here's my current build...
My PC...
Q6600 (G0 SLACR) @ 3.0 Ghz (stock voltage)
Artic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
ASROCK Penryn 1600SLI-110db
EVGA GTX260 Core 216 896MB Superclocked Edition
2 - WD Black 1TB
WD Black 750GB
WD Blue 500GB
8GB (4X2GB) PC2 6400 Corsair XMS2 (DDR2800)
Sony DRU810A DVDRW
Pioneer DVDRW
Coolmax 950 PS (CUG-950B)
Antec NineHundred Ultimate Gamer Case
2 - Acer AL2223W 22” LCDs
Dual OS Boot
W7 Ultimate 64-Bit
XP Pro 32-Bit
I was about to take the plunge and upgrade to a 1366 set up for @ $600 (my budget) but now Intel has released the 1155 socket which seems to beat out the i7 9xx series in almost everything (except the $900+ 6 cores). I'm more confused now than every.
I am an extreme multitasker and use my pc for day trading mostly running 12-15+ applications simultaneously. My q6600 has finally started to show lag in some areas and that was why I was considering upgrading.
I need to get the best set up for what I do, that is multitasking. I'm a moderate gamer at most and when I play a game that is the only thing running. I don't SLI and would most likely use any additional video cards for extra monitors. I'm not ruling out SLI in the future. I'm just stating it's not a priority right now. I do want the ability to add an additional video card or 2 to run 4-6 total monitors and would steer away from purchasing any motherboard with only 1 pcie 2.0 slot.
To compare my pc to others, I've used a friends set up with an AMD 1090T (6 physical cores) and similar other components to mine. I was extremely disappointed and felt that my current set up was just as good. I've also used another friends i5 760 with similar other components to me as well and it seemed much more peppy then the 1090T. Both systems were custom built by them and were not store bought systems with tons of bloat-ware. However, both systems did not display the "night and day" difference I got when going from my old Pentium D 3.2Ghz to the q6600 I have now. That is what I am looking for in this next upgrade.
So, my question is will the new Intel 2600k or 2500k give me the performance boost I'm looking for or am I going to have to wait for newer Intel chips with 6-8 physical cores (not Hyper Threading) to achieve this? If so, I will have to wait.
I've also been told that upgrading my OS to a SSD HD will do wonders but the steep price of the SSD drives are stopping me. That upgrade will have to come later.
Thanks for reading and any input is appreciated...EWB
My PC...
Q6600 (G0 SLACR) @ 3.0 Ghz (stock voltage)
Artic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
ASROCK Penryn 1600SLI-110db
EVGA GTX260 Core 216 896MB Superclocked Edition
2 - WD Black 1TB
WD Black 750GB
WD Blue 500GB
8GB (4X2GB) PC2 6400 Corsair XMS2 (DDR2800)
Sony DRU810A DVDRW
Pioneer DVDRW
Coolmax 950 PS (CUG-950B)
Antec NineHundred Ultimate Gamer Case
2 - Acer AL2223W 22” LCDs
Dual OS Boot
W7 Ultimate 64-Bit
XP Pro 32-Bit
I was about to take the plunge and upgrade to a 1366 set up for @ $600 (my budget) but now Intel has released the 1155 socket which seems to beat out the i7 9xx series in almost everything (except the $900+ 6 cores). I'm more confused now than every.
I am an extreme multitasker and use my pc for day trading mostly running 12-15+ applications simultaneously. My q6600 has finally started to show lag in some areas and that was why I was considering upgrading.
I need to get the best set up for what I do, that is multitasking. I'm a moderate gamer at most and when I play a game that is the only thing running. I don't SLI and would most likely use any additional video cards for extra monitors. I'm not ruling out SLI in the future. I'm just stating it's not a priority right now. I do want the ability to add an additional video card or 2 to run 4-6 total monitors and would steer away from purchasing any motherboard with only 1 pcie 2.0 slot.
To compare my pc to others, I've used a friends set up with an AMD 1090T (6 physical cores) and similar other components to mine. I was extremely disappointed and felt that my current set up was just as good. I've also used another friends i5 760 with similar other components to me as well and it seemed much more peppy then the 1090T. Both systems were custom built by them and were not store bought systems with tons of bloat-ware. However, both systems did not display the "night and day" difference I got when going from my old Pentium D 3.2Ghz to the q6600 I have now. That is what I am looking for in this next upgrade.
So, my question is will the new Intel 2600k or 2500k give me the performance boost I'm looking for or am I going to have to wait for newer Intel chips with 6-8 physical cores (not Hyper Threading) to achieve this? If so, I will have to wait.
I've also been told that upgrading my OS to a SSD HD will do wonders but the steep price of the SSD drives are stopping me. That upgrade will have to come later.
Thanks for reading and any input is appreciated...EWB