emmanuelxian07 :
What do you mean by that? What if for example we compare 2 Intel cores with the following specification: A) 2.8GHz 8MB and B) 3.2GHz 4MB. If I max out the RAM, which of the 2 cores would be better for gaming?
Depends on the game. But I suspect the higher clockspeed would be more advantageous in most cases. There was a whole lot of gaming benchmarks when the Athlon IIx4 first came out. The difference between the Athlon IIx4 and the Phenom IIx4 was the Athlon didn't have the cache.
In this test, the Athlon is at 3.1 while the phenom IIs are at 2.8 and 3.0:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Athlon_II_X4_645/10.html
In most, the phenom II is better but on occasion the Athlon II is close or will even perform better.
That said however, this may be a more extreme comparison as the Athlon has virtually no cache and the phenom II has 8 megs.
I'll see if I can find something related to 6 megs vs 12 megs with the core 2 processors.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/51?vs=76
The processors are identical but the blue one has more cache. Gaming is at the bottom. We can see they are close but the more cache is slightly better. I suspect based on that, that the increased clockspeed of a 3.2GHz core 2 with 4 megs of cache would be a better performer than the 2.8 with 8 megs of cache.
This benchmark contradicts me:
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/58?vs=87
I guess I really haven't given you much of an answer... and now I am tired and need sleep...