GTS 250 SLI vs new graphics card

BoerRepublic

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2010
37
0
18,530
I Have a gigabyte GTS 250 1GB GDDR3 and have been disappointed at my frame rates on 1280x1024 resolution. I'm thinking of getting a LG W2486L and I'm wondering if the card will be able to handle 1920 x 1080 res. Should I get another GTS 250 or get a new card and if so what do you suggest?

Specs
Gigabyte GTS 250 1GB
Intel core i5 650 @ 3.6 GHZ
Intel(R)5 series/3400 chipset
4 gig Ram
Huntkey True AFPC 700W Power Supply
 

Tamz_msc

Distinguished

I meant that the GTS 250 should give good performance at that resolution.On the other hand anyone with that resolution would like to get a higher resolution monitor.
 

BoerRepublic

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2010
37
0
18,530
I get 40fps average on mafia 2..... I do smell something fishy with this rig, it's relatively new but can't figure out whats slowing it down.
 

jryan388

Distinguished
Nov 1, 2009
1,342
0
19,460


PCIe running at 8x for sli is more than enough, especially with a gts 250... But yeah I would rather have a 460 too. Although if you've already got the 250, just grab another imo.
 


Sure if there is nothing else connected that uses pci-e lanes for I/O like USB 3.0 or a discrete audio card.
 
You need to read up on the pci-e limitation in depth to really understand what I had said earlier. For most users this isn't a problem since do not crossfire or sli. There are 16 lanes provided provided by the integrated controller on the cpu (mcm) then there is a few more provided by the SB for integrated stuff like SATA, USB, Super I/O, audio, and other things. So they use up those lanes so in your case you can get 8x8 sli but not any thing else like a sound card or a network card. I suggest that you avoid it while performance scaling isn't much of a problem for the G92 with your cpu.