Wait why are you even considering AMD when Sandy Bridge costs $50-60 more?
2500K demolishing the 970
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=186
2500K demolishing the 1100T
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=203
i5 760 beating the 1100T in games and, sadly enough, trading blows in content creation and archiving
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/191?vs=203
By the way the 1090/1100T costs MORE than the 2500k which is laughable.
These are at stock and it's common knowledge that even the older i5/7s are significantly faster clock for clock than AMD chips and will get crushed when both are overclocked to their maximum potential (which is higher for Intel because they're on a 32 nm process as opposed to AMD still using 40 nm). In fact, Phenom II's are competitors for Core 2s and besides the potential for unlocking cores and upgrading old AM2/+ motherboards, are still inferior to Intel on a price/performance basis for 99.9% of users.
So if you can't save/spare $50 for a Sandy Bridge (when you can afford a X6) then you're just plain stupid. Obviously you didn't bother to look up these comparisons on Google (you're sitting on a computer) so maybe you deserve to get ripped off.
Anyone encouraging this guy to build a new AMD system at this time is just as stupid.