Hi,
I just bought the cheapo version of Dell's XPS Studio, has an Athlon II X4 quad-core processor and an ATI Radeon HD 4200 card, 3gigs RAM. First thing, I pulled that card out and slipped my nVidia 9500GT in its place (with its latest driver, after flushing out the ATI's). I'd have expected the nVidia to be the best-performing, but even when tuned-up Win7 gave it an "experience index" score of only 3.1 vs. the ATI's 5.3 (no surprise that video performance was still the lowest category on the PC), so the ATI went back in.
Am I wrong about their relative performances (I didn't spend enough time with the 9500GT to make a comparison), or might there be some incompatibility with the AMD processor and the nVidia? I guess it would make some sense if that CPU preferred the ATI card, but such a jump in Win7's scores (if they mean anything) was a surprise. No biggie, just wondering -- I like nVidia. Thanks!
papilio
I just bought the cheapo version of Dell's XPS Studio, has an Athlon II X4 quad-core processor and an ATI Radeon HD 4200 card, 3gigs RAM. First thing, I pulled that card out and slipped my nVidia 9500GT in its place (with its latest driver, after flushing out the ATI's). I'd have expected the nVidia to be the best-performing, but even when tuned-up Win7 gave it an "experience index" score of only 3.1 vs. the ATI's 5.3 (no surprise that video performance was still the lowest category on the PC), so the ATI went back in.
Am I wrong about their relative performances (I didn't spend enough time with the 9500GT to make a comparison), or might there be some incompatibility with the AMD processor and the nVidia? I guess it would make some sense if that CPU preferred the ATI card, but such a jump in Win7's scores (if they mean anything) was a surprise. No biggie, just wondering -- I like nVidia. Thanks!
papilio