It'll be able to run Armed Assault in decent settings. It might even get by in highest, but the FPS wouldn't be pretty. And it might be able to run Crysis at a low resolution and lowest settings, but definitely not higher than that. Arma 2 is in the same boat as Crysis. To be honest, I wouldn't try to play either of those games, but I wouldn't mind playing Armed Assault on it.
I wont be running Armed Assault on maximum resolution, i play games at 1024x768 i dont see a difference in resolution on games, other then the Pixels but that does not mind me, and Crysis was played at High settings without AA though. and is there a site that like shows the list of games an graphics card can run?
Okay, i got the graphics card, i got Oblivion,Fallout 3, Armed Assault.
I can play Oblivion on max, no AA,1024x768 Res (same with fallout 3) but Armed Assault on Medium (1024x768 No AA, Low view, High textures, low shaders, very low terrain, no postprocessing, and only 20-30 FPS, Oblivion i get 40-50, Fallout 3 24-50
-Other thoughts, maybe its my processor? (Intel P4 HT, 2.8Ghz, Northwood(478 Socket)