Not sure if this is the right section for it but I guess it's related. Basically I'm buying a i5 760 with a msi hawk gtx 460 and the mobo would be the GA-P55A-UD3 (http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3242#ov).
As that is a p55 board, if I decide to use SATA3, the x16 lane gets cut into half making it x8. Now I did read the recent review that was published where the GTX 480 managed to lose about 8% in general from running the card in x8. What I'm curious about is how saturation scales between a 480 and my 460 so I could roughly determinate (unless you can tell me, if anyone has tested this before) how much of a performance decrease I'd get. If at all. This is important to me because I will decide over this whether I want to run my hard drive in SATA2 or SATA3. So far, I judge 8% to be a lot because I mostly care about performance in games and not how fast Photoshop will launch but of course that would be a good plus if the performance decrease is lower.
As that is a p55 board, if I decide to use SATA3, the x16 lane gets cut into half making it x8. Now I did read the recent review that was published where the GTX 480 managed to lose about 8% in general from running the card in x8. What I'm curious about is how saturation scales between a 480 and my 460 so I could roughly determinate (unless you can tell me, if anyone has tested this before) how much of a performance decrease I'd get. If at all. This is important to me because I will decide over this whether I want to run my hard drive in SATA2 or SATA3. So far, I judge 8% to be a lot because I mostly care about performance in games and not how fast Photoshop will launch but of course that would be a good plus if the performance decrease is lower.