I've narrowed my choice of motherboard for my new i5-2500k build to an ASUS P8P67 Rev3.0 or a Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 based on the features I need and the fact that they're both in stock locally and priced the same ($135 canadian after rebates).
Overall it seems like the ASUS is the best choice because I'm not planning any dual-GPU stuff and the fan control options on the Gigabyte suck, but I'm seeing a LOT of complaints online about ASUS boards failing lately.
Check out the Newegg ratings, there are almost as many 1/5s as there are 5/5s, lots from the past month, and even a lot of the higher ratings are from people who's boards failed and gave credit for the features anyway. A guy I know who work at a store also says more ASUS boards are coming back than others.
I'm going for a modestly overclocked (~4.5 Ghz) near-silent gaming build, no Crossfire, and I want to use onboard fan control, both of which the ASUS looks better for.
Is this problem being blown out of proportion or should I stay away from the ASUS board?
Overall it seems like the ASUS is the best choice because I'm not planning any dual-GPU stuff and the fan control options on the Gigabyte suck, but I'm seeing a LOT of complaints online about ASUS boards failing lately.
Check out the Newegg ratings, there are almost as many 1/5s as there are 5/5s, lots from the past month, and even a lot of the higher ratings are from people who's boards failed and gave credit for the features anyway. A guy I know who work at a store also says more ASUS boards are coming back than others.
I'm going for a modestly overclocked (~4.5 Ghz) near-silent gaming build, no Crossfire, and I want to use onboard fan control, both of which the ASUS looks better for.
Is this problem being blown out of proportion or should I stay away from the ASUS board?