I'm trying to decide which CPU to buy for a new system I'm building.
It will be used primarily for the following tasks
- 1080p video editing (Avid MC5, Premiere Pro CS5) with dual monitors
- BD authoring (NetBlender, Encore CS5)
- working with extremely large outdoor advertising image files in various CS5 apps
- occasional gaming (but I want it to be able to run demanding upcoming 2011 games at 1080p, perhaps dual monitors and 3D)
- possible future upgrade for 3D BD authoring
I considered a Xeon board with multiple CPUs, but decided against for the following reason:
I know that a machine with many cores would help with video encoding tasks or perhaps authoring/rendering tasks. However, the primary editing app that I use is Avid Media Composer 5. It is a 32-bit application that has to be run in a sort of Windows XP mode. At the office I use a 12-core MacPro, and I'm not sure how much Avid or FCP are benefiting from all those cores, as FCP is also a 32-bit application, which I understand are not very optimized for multi-threading.
I hope that a 6-core i7-990x is sufficient CPU for demanding multi-threading tasks that I might need to perform on my home computer.
The difference in price between the i7-990x and the 980x is only $50, certainly seems worth it.
However, the i7-970 is $400 cheaper and the i7-960 is $600 cheaper.
What would be the best way to estimate how much time I would save with CPU intensive tasks like encoding, authoring, rendering if I spend a little more on the 990x vs. going with the 960 or 970?
It will be used primarily for the following tasks
- 1080p video editing (Avid MC5, Premiere Pro CS5) with dual monitors
- BD authoring (NetBlender, Encore CS5)
- working with extremely large outdoor advertising image files in various CS5 apps
- occasional gaming (but I want it to be able to run demanding upcoming 2011 games at 1080p, perhaps dual monitors and 3D)
- possible future upgrade for 3D BD authoring
I considered a Xeon board with multiple CPUs, but decided against for the following reason:
I know that a machine with many cores would help with video encoding tasks or perhaps authoring/rendering tasks. However, the primary editing app that I use is Avid Media Composer 5. It is a 32-bit application that has to be run in a sort of Windows XP mode. At the office I use a 12-core MacPro, and I'm not sure how much Avid or FCP are benefiting from all those cores, as FCP is also a 32-bit application, which I understand are not very optimized for multi-threading.
I hope that a 6-core i7-990x is sufficient CPU for demanding multi-threading tasks that I might need to perform on my home computer.
The difference in price between the i7-990x and the 980x is only $50, certainly seems worth it.
However, the i7-970 is $400 cheaper and the i7-960 is $600 cheaper.
What would be the best way to estimate how much time I would save with CPU intensive tasks like encoding, authoring, rendering if I spend a little more on the 990x vs. going with the 960 or 970?