Solved

Cl6 or cl7?

hi,

so I'm thinking of getting a new memory, what i want to know is: which of these 2 is the best.

http://www.gskill.com/products.php?index=352

http://www.gskill.com/products.php?index=386

if u have better options please do tell.

cpu: i7 2600k
mobo: asus P8Z68-V PRO

*note: rig is for gaming.
7 answers Last reply Best Answer
More about tomshardware
  1. I will get this F3-12800CL8D-8GBXM, http://www.gskill.com/products.php?index=356&c1=1&c2=3, if you only like gskill.

    after you read this http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/corsair-vengeance-crucial-ballistix-kingston-hyperX,review-32168.html, you know why i take that memory.
  2. Best answer
    CL makes little to no difference in games and usually has a huge increase in price. But you will preferably want to get 1.5v.

    I would suggest you make a thread in the systems-new build section so we could help you pick parts and stay organized in one place.
  3. Best answer selected by uphigh016.
  4. Thank you. I'll repost my question in system-new build section
  5. After the fact, but helpful.

    Great article -> http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/memory/2011/01/11/the-best-memory-for-sandy-bridge/1 ; ultra low CAS has it's place for multitasking intensive environments.

    This are may favorite set for the LGA 1155; F3-12800CL8D-8GBXM http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231445 you do want at least 8GB for gaming especially with 64-bit games; see -> http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ram-memory-upgrade,2778-8.html

    BTW - don't forget to purchase a 64-bit OS ;)
  6. The answer, like in may things computing is, it depends....typically we will see only a 2-5 % performance increase in average fps.....but the increase in total system cost is less than that, then it is kind of hard to argue against the investment. In a addition usually where ya see an impact, it's on min fps more than average.

    In the above link, we see a 4.5% increase in min fps and that will come at an extra cost of $44 for 8GB. On a $2k box, that's a 2% increase in cost or about a 2 to 1 return on investment. Some would argue that you won't notice the difference, then again if ya spending $2k, ya ain't likely to notice the $44 :)

    Here's a other investigation where the results were a bit more dramatic

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/2792/12

    22.3 % (SLI) increase in minimum frame rates w/ C6 instead of C8 in Far Cry 2
    18% (single card) / 5% (SLI) increase in minimum frame rates w/ C6 instead of C8 in Dawn of War
    15% (single card) / 5% (SLI) increase in minimum frame rates w/ C6 instead of C8 in World in Conflict

    Here's what I am currently putting (All DDR3-1600) in my builds:

    $50 CAS 9 Corsair Low Profile Vengeance 2 x 4GB
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233196

    $65 CAS 8 Corsair Low Profile Vengeance 2 x 4GB
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233199

    $95 Mushkin Low Profile Raddioactive or Redline
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226221
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226178
  7. I keep seeing your post http://www.anandtech.com/show/2792/12 and assume it translates to ALL MOBO's, but it doesn't with the LGA 1155. The 'fixed' BCLK and to a degree the SB IMC of the LGA 1155 has more like a wall with DDR3-1600 CAS 8/9. On anything else that allows BCLK/FSB adjustment i.e. higher settings then sure you get the additional FPS above a ±1~±2 which is within the margin of error.

    Thomas's review showed the same results -> http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/corsair-vengeance-crucial-ballistix-kingston-hyperX,2907-8.html

    'Hopefully' this will change with the SB-E / LGA 2011 with an adjustable BCLK.
Ask a new question

Read More

Memory Intel i7 Product