I have been catching a lot of grief at work lately about being a AMD “fan boy”…
First off let me explain myself a little bit. I am in the I.S. industry. Previously I owned my own business at this time AMD was debuting their Athlon XP’s and Intel was debuting their P4 Hyper threading stuff. My AMD rep would often stop in and give us rebates, literature, and sometimes press kits with samples for us to “test” and give him some feedback. He also brought us lunch on occasion, and kept us educated on their product. This helped us sell systems and keep current on technology. On the other side of that, a Intel rep at a conference we went to gave us a stuffed Intel doll. So short of some of our distributers trying to push the expensive stuff down our throat we had very little interaction.
It seemed every time I would decide to build a Intel system, it’s around the time or right before they abandon a design and start fresh. I end up with a poor excuse for a over hyped system that Intel decided was garbage and went back to the drawing board. First example was a 2.4 HT P4. This cpu ran extremely hot and did not last long. My next was a Intel LGA775 P4 630, which was a 3.0 Prescott. This cpu got so hot and had such a poor heat sink design that the motherboard warped under the odd plastic clips. This cpu was rma-ed multiple times and was not stable.
My first AMD system was a 1800 T-bred. This thing was so stable, it was actually stable at like 40% over clock, Same with the 2500 Barton after that. Next was a disappointment the AMD 3200 754. Just because of the short lived socket and little support. I then built a FX57 this was the fastest single core x86 processor. I still use this computer as a Ubuntu media system almost 8 years later. I replaced that system with a AM2 Phenom 9950 black edition.
This brings me to what I am catching flack at work about. The Core 2 duo’s were out and the first Core I 7’s were coming out when I built this system. My AMD is a 65 nm processor with 512 (KB) L2, and 2048 (KB) L3. This is a joke compared to the Intel comparable systems from the same price and time period. 2007-2008 and Core2 duo e8600. I love my Phenom, and I work with core 2 duos and i5’s all day. I know they benchmark better, but my system just seems to run much better. Is this because my system is built with better components like WD 10k raptors, 8 gig corsair low latency xms ram, ASUS m3a motherboard, 2 Sapphire 1 gig HD Crossfire video cards, 1200w pc power and cooling psu. Or are the Intel’s really just a better system?
So I am at that point now where I am ready to build a new system again. I know the pros of Intel and I have read about AMD’s up and coming stuff. So do I wait or do I build a I core 7?
AMD has always done good for me and every Intel I have ever build absolutely sucked. But I want performance, faster than what I have now and something I won’t be upgrading for a long while.
I have already started buying some stuff for my new system, SSD’s case and PSU. So this is going to happen soon I hope. Any help would be amazing…
Thanks
First off let me explain myself a little bit. I am in the I.S. industry. Previously I owned my own business at this time AMD was debuting their Athlon XP’s and Intel was debuting their P4 Hyper threading stuff. My AMD rep would often stop in and give us rebates, literature, and sometimes press kits with samples for us to “test” and give him some feedback. He also brought us lunch on occasion, and kept us educated on their product. This helped us sell systems and keep current on technology. On the other side of that, a Intel rep at a conference we went to gave us a stuffed Intel doll. So short of some of our distributers trying to push the expensive stuff down our throat we had very little interaction.
It seemed every time I would decide to build a Intel system, it’s around the time or right before they abandon a design and start fresh. I end up with a poor excuse for a over hyped system that Intel decided was garbage and went back to the drawing board. First example was a 2.4 HT P4. This cpu ran extremely hot and did not last long. My next was a Intel LGA775 P4 630, which was a 3.0 Prescott. This cpu got so hot and had such a poor heat sink design that the motherboard warped under the odd plastic clips. This cpu was rma-ed multiple times and was not stable.
My first AMD system was a 1800 T-bred. This thing was so stable, it was actually stable at like 40% over clock, Same with the 2500 Barton after that. Next was a disappointment the AMD 3200 754. Just because of the short lived socket and little support. I then built a FX57 this was the fastest single core x86 processor. I still use this computer as a Ubuntu media system almost 8 years later. I replaced that system with a AM2 Phenom 9950 black edition.
This brings me to what I am catching flack at work about. The Core 2 duo’s were out and the first Core I 7’s were coming out when I built this system. My AMD is a 65 nm processor with 512 (KB) L2, and 2048 (KB) L3. This is a joke compared to the Intel comparable systems from the same price and time period. 2007-2008 and Core2 duo e8600. I love my Phenom, and I work with core 2 duos and i5’s all day. I know they benchmark better, but my system just seems to run much better. Is this because my system is built with better components like WD 10k raptors, 8 gig corsair low latency xms ram, ASUS m3a motherboard, 2 Sapphire 1 gig HD Crossfire video cards, 1200w pc power and cooling psu. Or are the Intel’s really just a better system?
So I am at that point now where I am ready to build a new system again. I know the pros of Intel and I have read about AMD’s up and coming stuff. So do I wait or do I build a I core 7?
AMD has always done good for me and every Intel I have ever build absolutely sucked. But I want performance, faster than what I have now and something I won’t be upgrading for a long while.
I have already started buying some stuff for my new system, SSD’s case and PSU. So this is going to happen soon I hope. Any help would be amazing…
Thanks