Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0 or
RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to be a
match made in power user heaven.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:07:06 -0700, "A.T. Larsen" <atl@wyb.> wrote:
>They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0 or
>RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to be a
>match made in power user heaven.
And they make convertibles that u can use for hauling lumbers.
They don't make these 'cuz it doesn't make sense!!!
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
Yes, yes, 'want' and 'need' are two different things.
But it makes sense to have an Intel-based laptop with RAID? Why the AMD
prejudice?
--Salamander
"bobb" <None@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:lqs111dem6hama3t5plgq1fb1r1bo5b64g@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:07:06 -0700, "A.T. Larsen" <atl@wyb.> wrote:
>
>>They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0
>>or
>>RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to be
>>a
>>match made in power user heaven.
>
>
> And they make convertibles that u can use for hauling lumbers.
>
> They don't make these 'cuz it doesn't make sense!!!
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
A.T. Larsen wrote:
> They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support
> RAID0 or RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It
> seems to be a match made in power user heaven.
>
> --Salamander
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
Your link is to WinBook's PowerSpec line of desktops. The word 'notebook'
appears on that page only in the navigation strip at the top. All of
WinBook's laptops are Intel-based.
--Salamander
"Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net> wrote in message
news:xMadnVUJvPIPgozfRVn-2A@comcast.com...
> A.T. Larsen wrote:
>> They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support
>> RAID0 or RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It
>> seems to be a match made in power user heaven.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
A.T. Larsen wrote:
> Yes, yes, 'want' and 'need' are two different things.
>
> But it makes sense to have an Intel-based laptop with RAID? Why the AMD
> prejudice?
>
> --Salamander
>
>
> "bobb" <None@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
> news:lqs111dem6hama3t5plgq1fb1r1bo5b64g@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:07:06 -0700, "A.T. Larsen" <atl@wyb.> wrote:
>>
>>>They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0
>>>or
>>>RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to be
>>>a
>>>match made in power user heaven.
>>
>>
>> And they make convertibles that u can use for hauling lumbers.
>>
>> They don't make these 'cuz it doesn't make sense!!!
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
>> "bobb" <None@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:lqs111dem6hama3t5plgq1fb1r1bo5b64g@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:07:06 -0700, "A.T. Larsen" <atl@wyb.> wrote:
>>>
>>>>They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0
>>>>or
>>>>RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to
>>>>be
>>>>a
>>>>match made in power user heaven.
>>>
>>>
>>> And they make convertibles that u can use for hauling lumbers.
>>>
>>> They don't make these 'cuz it doesn't make sense!!!
> A.T. Larsen wrote:
>>
>> Yes, yes, 'want' and 'need' are two different things.
>>
>> But it makes sense to have an Intel-based laptop with RAID? Why the AMD
>> prejudice?
"RedpIll" <RedpIll@takeIT.org> wrote in message
news:1112ccdnbet332d@corp.supernews.com...
> cause amd is a better deal than intel
Agreed, which is why I want to know why no one has made a fire-breathing
RAID equipped AMD Athlon 64 laptop. I can get an Intel Pentium 4 laptop
with RAID but no AMD love.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
A.T. Larsen <atl@wyb.> wrote:
: They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0 or
: RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to be a
: match made in power user heaven.
Probably due to the chipset. Intel has at least one chipset that
supports RAID 0/1 (not sure about laptops however). I'm guessing that
chipset options for AMD-based laptops are more limited.
Andrew
--
----> Portland, Oregon, USA <----
*******************************************************************
----> http://www.bizave.com <---- Photo Albums and Portland Info
----> To Email me remove "MYSHOES" from email address
*******************************************************************
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:00:49 -0700, "Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net>
wrote:
>A.T. Larsen wrote:
>> They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support
>> RAID0 or RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It
>> seems to be a match made in power user heaven.
>>
>> --Salamander
>
>Google: notebook athlon 64 raid
>
>http://www.winbook.com/press/2004/110904c.html for example.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
Andrew wrote:
> A.T. Larsen <atl@wyb.> wrote:
> : They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0
> : or
> : RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to
> : be a match made in power user heaven.
>
> Probably due to the chipset. Intel has at least one chipset that
> supports RAID 0/1 (not sure about laptops however). I'm guessing that
> chipset options for AMD-based laptops are more limited.
Well, now, depends on whether you want RAID support in the BIOS or not.
I've had RAID running on my Gateway, but using external drives and Linux.
>
> Andrew
> --
> ----> Portland, Oregon, USA <----
> *******************************************************************
> ----> http://www.bizave.com <---- Photo Albums and Portland Info
> ----> To Email me remove "MYSHOES" from email address
> *******************************************************************
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
bobb wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:00:49 -0700, "Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net>
> wrote:
>
>>A.T. Larsen wrote:
>>> They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support
>>> RAID0 or RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It
>>> seems to be a match made in power user heaven.
>>>
>>> --Salamander
>>
>>Google: notebook athlon 64 raid
>>
>>http://www.winbook.com/press/2004/110904c.html for example.
>
>
> oh my God, raid exists for laptops!
>
> Hey man, go for it, good luck with that brick.
I think you folks missed this at the top of the page:
"WinBook Unveils New Range of PowerSpec ***> Desktop <*** Computers"
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
J. Clarke <jclarke@nospam.invalid> wrote:
: Andrew wrote:
: > A.T. Larsen <atl@wyb.> wrote:
: > : They make Athlon 64 based laptops. They make laptops that support RAID0
: > : or
: > : RAID1. Why no Athlon 64 based laptops that support RAID? It seems to
: > : be a match made in power user heaven.
: >
: > Probably due to the chipset. Intel has at least one chipset that
: > supports RAID 0/1 (not sure about laptops however). I'm guessing that
: > chipset options for AMD-based laptops are more limited.
: Well, now, depends on whether you want RAID support in the BIOS or not.
: I've had RAID running on my Gateway, but using external drives and Linux.
I suspect most people want RAID support in the BIOS, because they use
Windows not Linux unfortunately.
Andrew
--
----> Portland, Oregon, USA <----
*******************************************************************
----> http://www.bizave.com <---- Photo Albums and Portland Info
----> To Email me remove "MYSHOES" from email address
*******************************************************************
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.