As it stands:
6850 = Barts Pro (960 shaders)
6870 = Barts XT (1120 shaders)
6950 = Cayman Pro (1760 shaders, maybe)
6970 = Cayman XT (1920 shaders, very likely)
6990 = Antilles (? shaders)
Number names of Cayman and Antilles cited from: http://www.fudzilla.com/graphics/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950
Anyone want to rant about how they don't like the assigned numbers names?
Does anyone agree with the given number names?
In light of Barts, what are we going to be looking at for the performance of Cayman and Antilles?
What exactly is Antilles going to be make of? Will Antilles use to fully fledged Cayman XT GPUs, two Cayman Pro GPUs, some cut down version of either or something else completely different? What heat and power usage characteristics will we be looking at for Antilles?
Feel free to address one, some, or all of these questions.
6850 = Barts Pro (960 shaders)
6870 = Barts XT (1120 shaders)
6950 = Cayman Pro (1760 shaders, maybe)
6970 = Cayman XT (1920 shaders, very likely)
6990 = Antilles (? shaders)
Number names of Cayman and Antilles cited from: http://www.fudzilla.com/graphics/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950
Anyone want to rant about how they don't like the assigned numbers names?
Does anyone agree with the given number names?
In light of Barts, what are we going to be looking at for the performance of Cayman and Antilles?
What exactly is Antilles going to be make of? Will Antilles use to fully fledged Cayman XT GPUs, two Cayman Pro GPUs, some cut down version of either or something else completely different? What heat and power usage characteristics will we be looking at for Antilles?
Feel free to address one, some, or all of these questions.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram