http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Bulldozer-Interlagos-Phoronix-Test-Suite-Benchmark-16-core,12445.html
Interesting but I will lay some up front stuff to avoid stupid flaming and /or fighting:
1. This is 32 BD cores compared to 4 SB and 6 Nehalem cores. So its not ANY indication as to how well Zambezi (4-8 core BD units) will perform against current Intel stuff.
2. The clock speed is low but thats normal for AMD when they intro more cores into the server market. They always start off with low and move up higher where Intel replicates its desktop side in clock speed. Does not indicate that BD wont be able to clock higher.
Overall, i think its a pure BS benchmark. No idea why they would even think of comparing 4 cores 8 threads to 32 cores but who am I to disagree with them?
Interesting but I will lay some up front stuff to avoid stupid flaming and /or fighting:
1. This is 32 BD cores compared to 4 SB and 6 Nehalem cores. So its not ANY indication as to how well Zambezi (4-8 core BD units) will perform against current Intel stuff.
2. The clock speed is low but thats normal for AMD when they intro more cores into the server market. They always start off with low and move up higher where Intel replicates its desktop side in clock speed. Does not indicate that BD wont be able to clock higher.
Overall, i think its a pure BS benchmark. No idea why they would even think of comparing 4 cores 8 threads to 32 cores but who am I to disagree with them?