Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (
More info?)
In article <g-OdnUPw14zDS2rcRVn-hA@giganews.com>, frank@fshe2fs.com says...
>
>Colin wrote:
>> hmmm... just trying to find any buyer at this point... :-)
>>
>> or even someone who'd publish them for a start... have "cold called"
>> via email a couple of local newspapers, etc... not much headway
>> yet... feedback on the pix is always excellent though...
>>
>>
http://www.colinmarr.com/
>>
>> first goal is to make some cash towards the next camera...
>> just baby steps...
>
>
>A thought or two:
>
>To sell a picture, you must have something a buyer wants badly enough to
>exchange money for its use.
>
>Do you have something? Who is the likely buyer?
>
>Do you have a buyer in mind? If you have something appropriate, how will
>you bring it to his attention?
>
>It seems to me the whole thing hinges on accidental or calculated
>*uniqueness* of your image meeting a natural or created *need*. You can
>start at either end of that relationship: learn the needs of prospective
>buyers and make distinctive images to fulfil them, or make unique images
>and convince buyers they need them.
>
>My first sale was so buyer-specific I knew if he saw it he would _have_
>to have it, so I just sent it along with an offer for one-time US rights
>and a price, and he couldn't pay me fast enough. Lucky, yes; alert to
>the environment and making imaginative connections resulted the
>grab-shot as an inevitable sale.
>
>My last sale, by contrast, was just a minor but sweet change on a common
>and enjoyable theme. I gifted a small print to a gregarious, social
>person, and the requests keep on coming.
>
>Neither of those was taken with what could be considered 'professional'
>equipment, nor was either technically flawless. Composition and 'punch'
>were excellent, and content won the day.
>
>All this to say there are myriad determinants of sales, *not* among the
>most important of which is equipment.
>
>
>--
>Frank ess
>aibohphobia, n., The fear of palindromes.
Frank, very well stated. I wish I could have said those things nearly as well.
You got me to thinking about the images that I have sold as *stock* over the
years, and realized that the one that has generated the most sales, though
maybe not in $ terms, was a snapshot of my wife, sitting on a carrousel horse
at a now long-defunct amusement park. While done with a Nikon F w/ 105 f/2.5,
it was just a grab-shot that looked nice.
With more reflection, I suppose my first "big sale" was some helicopter shots
that I did, while filming a training piece for an offshore exploration client,
while still in film school. After a day with a CP-16 on my shoulder, I grabbed
some Nikons and went up to the working deck of the platform, just as a
helicopter from an offshore ferry service landed. I shot about 3 rolls of it,
mainly with 20mm lens and a Polarizer. When I made C-prints of the chromes a
gift to the director of marketing for that company, they bought the entire
shoot for their annual report, plus ancillary ad usage. Maybe that is why I
didn't persue motion, even with a degree in film, and ended up shooting ad
stills for the rest of my life...
Thanks for the comments,
Hunt