Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Photoshop Build, Storage Question

Last response: in Systems
Share
January 8, 2011 3:19:14 PM

I am currently in the design process for a system that will be dedicated to Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign for my brother. I am not familiar with any of these programs and have been doing some research on their requirement. Right now I am trying to decide what I need from a storage standpoint. From my research I have found that the target and source files are best put on different drives. Then the scratch file is best left off the drive with the OS and where Photoshop is installed. I would also assume it is best to put the scratch file on a drive that does not contain the source or target.

So my question is, what is the best arrangement of drives that will be optimized for Photoshop. I have considered the following setups.

A) Drives 1 and 2 in a Raid 0 setup. This will be my C: drive and will contain OS, programs, target and source files for photoshop. Then the 3rd drive would backup drives 1 and 2 and also contain my scratch file. My concern with this setup is all files are on the same drive basically, but they are on a Raid 0 setup so hopefully that would overcome that problem.

B) Drive 1 would be normal C: drive (OS, programs, target) Drive 2 would contain source files and Drive 3 would be where the scratch file is and system backup. With this setup I am concerned Drive 2 would have a lot of wasted space since it is only used for source files.

This is kind of what I am thinking, but I am extremely open to any better ideas or thoughts. I would rather not use SSDs right now because I am not familiar with them and their cost.

I also have a quick Photoshop question about the source and target files. Are the source files basically images you would be importing into what you are working on. Then the target file would be the finished product or what you are currently working on. Would the target file have to be on the same drive as the Photoshop program?

thanks,
January 9, 2011 5:47:22 PM

GREAT RAID review article here To RAID or not to RAID

Basically with 3 drives, you're best to go with option B, if you bump up to 5 drives you could do a C: drive with a RAID 10, but I am currently looking into getting a similar system and I am only going with a C: SSD drive and a D: 7200RPM 1TB for my source & target files (RAW images + project files)
January 10, 2011 3:39:11 AM

After investigating this a little more I think I have narrowed down my options again.

Option A: Drive 1 (Samsung F4 320GB) containing OS and Programs
Drive 2 and 3 (both Samsung F4 320 GB) in RAID0 array with 2 partitions. Partition 1 (100GB) Scratch File, Partition 2 (540GB) source files and saved data
Drive 4 (Samsung F3 1TB) for backup

Option B: Drive 1 (Samsung F4 320GB) containing OS and Programs
Drive 2 (Samsung F4 320GB) for source files and saved data
Drive 3 (Samsung F3 1TB) with 2 partitions. Partition 1 (100GB) scratch file, Partition 2 (900GB) Backup

My concerns with option A is the reliability of a RAID0 array and just the added cost of 4 Drives. Probably the best performance though and really its only 40 bucks more.

Concerns with Option B, will having the scratch file on a partitioned disk degrade its performance. It will be on the backup disk so that disk won't be accessed very often, but it is partitioned.
!