Intel Atom N550 vs. Celeron E3400 File Server Tags: CPUs Celeron File Server Intel Windows Server 2008 Last response: April 16, 2011 8:09 AM in CPUs Share irulz108 April 15, 2011 5:42:53 PM I was wondering, which would be a better option for a low power file server running Windows Server 2008. Intel Atom N550 - http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=50154&wapkw=%28n55... Intel Celeron Dual-Core E3400 - http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=42772 Thoughts? More about : intel atom n550 celeron e3400 file server popatim a c 141 à CPUs a b å Intel April 15, 2011 11:44:57 PM Either one will work fine, I'd go with the celeron for the cheaper price, more board selection (which means you'll be able to find boards with 6 sata ports), and be able to address more than 2gb of ram (the limit of the n550) should the need arise. m 0 l das_stig a c 103 à CPUs a b å Intel April 16, 2011 8:09:33 AM Celeron, 4GB of ram. Recommend M$ SVR 08 R2 SP1 x64. or wait for new version of M$ home server. m 0 l Can't find your answer ? Ask ! Publish Related resources Intel atom N550 vs Intel Celeron 743 Forum Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Atom D510 Forum SolvedIntel Atom N330 vs Intel Atom N550 Forum Intel (R) Celeron (R) CPU E3400 @ 2.60 GHz Vs Pentium 4 Forum SolvedIntel Celeron E3300 vs Intel Atom D510 Forum Intel® Atom™ D525 Dual-Core vs Intel Celeron 743 Forum Athlon 64 sk754 or Intel Atom for file\backup server and folding? Forum More resources Read discussions in other CPUs categories AMD Intel Intel i5 Intel i7 Phenom Cooling Performance !