Let me start by saying I understand why somebody would want a 2600k with 4.5 OC and twin HD6970s OCd to the max
To me it is the same as cars
I might only NEED a 4 cyclinder Civic/Sentra etc
BUT would I love to have a Porsche Turbo
Now to get to the point as fast as I can
I am right now as I am typing this
1) running ten instances of Sony Vegas Pro 8
2)i have network rendering service open and have about 8 jobs queud to
go to renderer machine
3)3 internet explorers
4) adobe photoshop CS
5) MS outlook
6)WinTV USB tv tuner showing cable TV
7)icon dock
8)msi afterburner
9) coretemp
10) Mooo system monitor
11) DvdFlick encoding/burning a 1.5gb 1080p file
Now nothing is lagging
I am doing light duty work on PhotoShop (resizing and adding text)
I am doing some editing on Vegas Pro (transitions,text,effects)
while browsing and watching Animal Planet
System specs are
Dell Optiplex 745
Core2Duo E4500 @2.93ghz 1066 FSB
4gb Gskill DDR2-800 5-5-5-15
250gb 7200rpm Barracuda
Sapphire HD 4650 1gb
Asus Xonar DG
Now that is an awesome system BACK IN 2006-2007
A 2600k or any of the I7 series would ANNIHILATE that
system
I am just a simple hardware tech just making a live
Heck I learned alot of what I know from Googling and Youtube LOL
So my question is (finally!)
other than hardcore gamers who need to have maxed out res and settings
on latest games (totally cool - I understand - the eyecandy is awesome)
and also people who develop video rendering/3d modeling/encoding
for a living and time is mission critical
really isnt todays CPU tech way beyond about 80-90 percent of computer users
I just see on Toms many times when "computer enthusiasts"
act very snobby and condescending to people that only have a Pentium 4/Pent D/C2d/Athlon 64 x 2 etc
really if you have even a decent Pentium D with 2-4gb ram and a reasonable
video card (8600gt or HD2600 or higher)
then you can pretty much do 95% of applications rather well
Can we stop the "Computer Elitist Snobbery" on Toms
Dont tell me it doesnt exist
I have been a steady regular for almost a year
I see it constantly
When is enough is enough?
To me it is the same as cars
I might only NEED a 4 cyclinder Civic/Sentra etc
BUT would I love to have a Porsche Turbo
Now to get to the point as fast as I can
I am right now as I am typing this
1) running ten instances of Sony Vegas Pro 8
2)i have network rendering service open and have about 8 jobs queud to
go to renderer machine
3)3 internet explorers
4) adobe photoshop CS
5) MS outlook
6)WinTV USB tv tuner showing cable TV
7)icon dock
8)msi afterburner
9) coretemp
10) Mooo system monitor
11) DvdFlick encoding/burning a 1.5gb 1080p file
Now nothing is lagging
I am doing light duty work on PhotoShop (resizing and adding text)
I am doing some editing on Vegas Pro (transitions,text,effects)
while browsing and watching Animal Planet
System specs are
Dell Optiplex 745
Core2Duo E4500 @2.93ghz 1066 FSB
4gb Gskill DDR2-800 5-5-5-15
250gb 7200rpm Barracuda
Sapphire HD 4650 1gb
Asus Xonar DG
Now that is an awesome system BACK IN 2006-2007
A 2600k or any of the I7 series would ANNIHILATE that
system
I am just a simple hardware tech just making a live
Heck I learned alot of what I know from Googling and Youtube LOL
So my question is (finally!)
other than hardcore gamers who need to have maxed out res and settings
on latest games (totally cool - I understand - the eyecandy is awesome)
and also people who develop video rendering/3d modeling/encoding
for a living and time is mission critical
really isnt todays CPU tech way beyond about 80-90 percent of computer users
I just see on Toms many times when "computer enthusiasts"
act very snobby and condescending to people that only have a Pentium 4/Pent D/C2d/Athlon 64 x 2 etc
really if you have even a decent Pentium D with 2-4gb ram and a reasonable
video card (8600gt or HD2600 or higher)
then you can pretty much do 95% of applications rather well
Can we stop the "Computer Elitist Snobbery" on Toms
Dont tell me it doesnt exist
I have been a steady regular for almost a year
I see it constantly
When is enough is enough?