Thanks for the answers, guys. I need help making an informed decision.
On the other hand, three answers with three different conclusions. I should keep the 570t, except I should take the 590t instead, but I should build my own.
I would like to take option 3, but have no experience and would rather be able to take more time learning how than "think fast." But I am seriously hoping that by the time it's time to get a new computer, I will be able to take cmcghee358's
advice and build my own.
I would be intrested in knowing how much I could save (or get a better machine for the same money, which is also saving) by DIY.
That said, my only two options for this computer purchase are the 570t or the 590t.
I really like the i7-2600 processor, based on both using it and what I've read about it. I have had no success getting meaningful comparisons between the two processors (i7-970 vs. i7-2600). I hear things about the six core being better in certain "multi-threaded applications," but I don't know what they are or if I'd ever do them.
I DO want Blu Ray, and the 590t gives that.
To Jim, thanks. The one thing I'd point out is that BOTH computers have a two year warranty. That was actually the thing that put me over the top deciding to purchase the 570t: I decided NOT to buy an extended warranty, but to put my money into better components. And the two years was my trigger, giving me both protection and components.
I have learned a lot since getthing this computer that I never knew before. I understand what Jim is saying: the 2600 has a built in graphics, and a dedicated card is better for hard-core gamers.
I plan to do SOME gaming, but not a lot. For me, it would be more photo and video editing. I'm told that some video apps take better advantage of the six cores and 12 threads of the 970. But I don't know if I'd do whatever that is. The tests show the 2600 is significantly better at Photoshop.
Ideally, based on what I know, I'd keep the 570t with the i7-2600 Sandy Bridge and add Blu Ray later - or maybe add it in April if I can. If I bought it later, I'd be waiting till the internal unit was under maybe $70 (and by then maybe I'd even have figured out how to do the install!).
I dare say that the things that would most influence me are:
1) how fast the i7-2600 vs. the i7-970 would be obsolete. The Sandy Bridge is newer and more advanced, but more and more apps are likely to take advantage of the six cores. Which will be obsolete faster???
2) how reliable and durable the 2600 would be relative to the 970. Would they both last about as long as each other??? The 2600 uses less power, and I understand it deals with heat very well, having a new fan system. But I don't know much, particularly comparing the two processors.
3) how inexpensive Blu Ray burners are likely to get. I don't need it now, but think I'd really want it down the road.
4) just the mix of components: the 2600 would seem to be a much better processor for MOST applications, even though it literally cost half as much as the 970. But is that worth passing on a system that has the Blu Ray right now? And then there's that matter of the i7-970 system having the extra gig of RAM.
Lastly, I'm not exactly sure what "wireless N" is. I paid an extra $50 to have a wireless card installed for internet. It has worked seamlessly with my Linksys "G" series router. I was happy that it worked with the old router, so I wouldn't have to upgrade with the older one was still working fine.
I have gone from deciding to keep the 570t, to deciding to get the 590t instead, to thinking maybe I'd keep the 570t and add Blu Ray down the road, to pulling hair out of my head...