Physicist Graham Flint is working on an ultra-high-resolution portrait
of America -- a series of gigantic, gigapixel images taken with a
custom camera made from bits and pieces of decommissioned Cold War
hardware.
Wow... guess he's not using Compact Flash to store em...
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:56:12 +1100, Richard
<richard@hot-chilli.com.no.spam.au> wrote:
>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66498,00.html
>
>Physicist Graham Flint is working on an ultra-high-resolution portrait
>of America -- a series of gigantic, gigapixel images taken with a
>custom camera made from bits and pieces of decommissioned Cold War
>hardware.
>
>Wow... guess he's not using Compact Flash to store em...
He's using film.
"The gigapixel camera is very large format, using 9-inch-by-18-inch
plates. It's the same format used in military spy planes like the U-2.
In fact, Flint uses old spy plane film magazines. "It was surplused
out, and I bought up most of them (about a dozen)," Flint said.
Large rolls of Kodak film, used mostly for aerial photography and
geological surveys, cost $1,200 each. The film is
ultra-high-resolution -- 4,000 pixels per inch -- but on a square-inch
basis, it costs less than 35mm, Flint said. He cuts the film himself
and loads it onto the magazines. "
**************************************************************
"...who would you think is not a "future statist"?
"Any one who thinks the end game of the political
process is the abolition of the state and its
replacement with a free market for all the so
called functions of the state.
Any one less is in the end, a statist."
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Richard wrote:
> http://www.wired.com/news/technolo [...] 98,00.html >
> Physicist Graham Flint is working on an ultra-high-resolution portrait
> of America -- a series of gigantic, gigapixel images taken with a
> custom camera made from bits and pieces of decommissioned Cold War
> hardware.
>
> Wow... guess he's not using Compact Flash to store em...
Guess not.
Just for fun, the cliffs overlooking Black's (swimsuit optional) Beach
in the "People watching" photo on the above site are visible in this
image above the line of people silhouetted against the ocean, close to
the center:
http://www.fototime.com/3DB7A2457447A35/orig.jpg
Thr location from which the latter was made can be seen (well, located)
near the farthest-right large building (939 Coast Boulevard) on the
promontory in the second crop from the giant "Torrey Pines Golf Course"
image on this page:
http://www.gigapxl.org/gallery-TorreyPines.htm
I was a Photo Interpreter and Photogrammetrist (made aeronautical
charts) in the US Air Force. Saw a lot of that big film, not much of it
color, though. Nice stereo images from adjacent frames from the vertical
cameras.
As I recall it, the focal lengths of those cameras was in the range of
17 to 34 inches. K-something camera designations.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:56:12 +1100, Richard
<richard@hot-chilli.com.no.spam.au> wrote:
>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66498,00.html
>
>Physicist Graham Flint is working on an ultra-high-resolution portrait
>of America -- a series of gigantic, gigapixel images taken with a
>custom camera made from bits and pieces of decommissioned Cold War
>hardware.
>
>Wow... guess he's not using Compact Flash to store em... >
It always amuses me when people rate an analog film by digital (pixel)
scale.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.