Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Closed

Evga geforce gts sc 1 gb vs bfg 9800 gtx+ 1gb

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
January 3, 2011 9:33:34 AM

Hello, system specs
intel quad core 2.33 ghz
bfg 550 watt power supply
asus P5QL-VM EPU mother board
dual boot xp and windows & 64 bit
7 gb 800 mhz ddr2 ram
my current card is a
bfg 9800 gtx+ 1gb oc
ordered a 450 gts sc evga
basically for gddr5 memory and mainly for direct x11
after reading a lil more after i made my choice i had already noticed
this card had gddr5 an upgrade 192 cuda cores vs 128 an upgrade
but i noticed on the memory interface i had 256 vs the 128 of
the gts 450 sc am i going to notice any more fps i know the
memory interface is how fast the card talks to the memory
so will one gb ddr5 192 cuda cores 882MHz core clock 3800 MHz memory clock 1764 MHz shader clock on 128 bit be as fast or will it be faster than my
256 bit gddr3 750 mhz core clock 1000mhz memory clock (2000mhz data rate) with only 128 cuda cores?
will it perform better other than what i know direct x11 will bring through tesselation
January 3, 2011 11:56:15 AM

yout limited by the Q8200 (if thats what your using), and 7gb DDR2 wtf USE MATCHED PAIRS FOR DUAL CHANNEL, more ram can actually DECREASE PERFORMANCE, also dump xp and do a solid windows 7 64 install comeon seriously, and i hope your "550 watt power supply" is a branded psu.
Score
0

Best solution

a b Î Nvidia
a b } Memory
January 3, 2011 11:57:35 AM

They are about equal in performance as far as games go.
Share
Related resources
a b Î Nvidia
a b } Memory
January 3, 2011 12:05:45 PM

apache_lives said:
yout limited by the Q8200 (if thats what your using), and 7gb DDR2 wtf USE MATCHED PAIRS FOR DUAL CHANNEL, more ram can actually DECREASE PERFORMANCE, also dump xp and do a solid windows 7 64 install comeon seriously, and i hope your "550 watt power supply" is a branded psu.



Some of us still need XP for programs that will not run under Win7. Even in the XP mode of 7 so ditching it is not an option.
Some of my older games I stiip play occasionally will not install or run after installed. AOE will run but has seriously screwed up colors. trees are red etc.
Also my credit card processing software will only run on XP. so ditching XP is NOT an option.
Score
0
January 12, 2011 11:20:28 PM

apache_lives said:
yout limited by the Q8200 (if thats what your using), and 7gb DDR2 wtf USE MATCHED PAIRS FOR DUAL CHANNEL, more ram can actually DECREASE PERFORMANCE, also dump xp and do a solid windows 7 64 install comeon seriously, and i hope your "550 watt power supply" is a branded psu.

bfg tech gs series atx12v2.2 dual 12 volt rails
Score
0
January 12, 2011 11:24:19 PM

Unolocogringo said:
They are about equal in performance as far as games go.

after installing it i agree bout the same little better whats alot better is direct x11 the degree of detail added by the tessallation is increadible
Score
0
January 12, 2011 11:29:27 PM

Unolocogringo said:
Some of us still need XP for programs that will not run under Win7. Even in the XP mode of 7 so ditching it is not an option.
Some of my older games I stiip play occasionally will not install or run after installed. AOE will run but has seriously screwed up colors. trees are red etc.
Also my credit card processing software will only run on XP. so ditching XP is NOT an option.

i like xp and you are correct there is alot of software that will not run on windows 7 so ditching my xp is not an option whats it going to hurt ? its on its own partition ...
Score
0
January 12, 2011 11:31:06 PM

Best answer selected by Ne0.
Score
0
a b Î Nvidia
a b } Memory
January 13, 2011 5:13:26 AM

This topic has been closed by Maziar
Score
0
!