Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Sound Cards > Yes or No to a soundcard?

Yes or No to a soundcard?

Forum CPU & Components : Sound Cards Yes or No to a soundcard?

Word :    Username :           
 

For my new build I am planning to purchase Asus Rampage III Formula Motherboard with SupremeFX X-Fi 2 as onboard audio chipset. I currently use M-Audio Studiophile3 as my speakers. These speakers are actually built for studio/monitoring so they offer high quality sounds (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16836127010). However, most of what I will be doing will be listening to music and gaming. Do you think getting an audio card will make any noticable difference vs using the onboard audio chipset? If so, which audio card do you recommend?


Message edited by jkeaton88 on 06-14-2011 at 04:48:48 PM
Reply to jkeaton88
Register or log in to remove.

they are built for such prupoe, however they arent exactly classed as say... excellent... not excellent enough to resolve the difference between an onboard and a soundcard.

however if you are doubting what im sainyg, try a soundcard for a test, and make some BS excuse when you want to return it- that is if you arent satisfied... worked for me...

Reply to MEgamer

Those speakers aren't good enough to distinguish, I think. Also, you'd need excellent sound output files.

------------------------------ x4 965 3.8ghz, EVGA 460 1gb OCed at 840/1680/1000, TX750W (overkill), 2x4gb G.Skill 1333, 1tb Caviar Green, In Win Dragon Slayer, Xigmatek Loki SD963, DeathAdder, Qck, Das Silent
Reply to kajabla

Those speakers are not good enough to be able to do better with a soundcard. Your built in sound card should do just as well IMO.

Reply to blackhawk1928

If you are going with Win7 64 bit as the OS, then don't waste your time with a soundcard. Soundcards using Win7 64 bit often have DPC Latency issues that the onboard audio can ignore. The DPC Latency issue shows as a stutter in the audio output and is very annoying. WinXP doesn't have this issue.

Reply to Chuckels550

i havent heard any poeple, with soudncard regarding stutter and lag issues.

Reply to MEgamer

I don't have any clue what you're talking about, Chuckels. Being an absolute audio enthusiast, none of my sound cards have ever given me any 'stutter in the audio output'.

But despite what everyone else is saying, I disagree. If you were to get a decent audio card right now, you'd have a minor improvement in sound quality (those speakers aren't all that precise), but to go along with that you'd already have what you need then when you decide to get a better sound system. Get what I'm saying? If you were to upgrade your speakers right now, you'd still be held back by onboard sound...

Just my $0.02.


Message edited by someguynamedmatt on 06-19-2011 at 04:54:24 PM
Reply to someguynamedmatt

first I've heard of any audio stutter....I've had static and buzzing issues, but never stuttering... I vote for dedicated audio card though, just cuz I feel like it....lol. Difference between my VIA integrated garbage and my Xonar DG was like night and day, even with cheap headphones.

Reply to sykozis

I'd say he was having typical Creative driver issues (or similar, so you don't quote me on specifying Creative) and just figured that all sound cards are the same. Oh well...

Reply to someguynamedmatt

I just purchased a Creative Sound Blaste X-FI Extreme Audio soundcard vs. my Realtek HD onboard, and the sound is way better. I use it for gaming and listening to music. I'm using Creative's Sound Blaster Tactic3D Sigma headphones, and although I can hear a difference in both gaming and music the most vital change has to be the music. It just sounds so awesome I almost cried first time I heard music. I know nothing about sound specifically, but I know enough to say there's a definite change of sound quality here. I just wonder what a more expensive soundcard would do since this one was only 60-80 bucks.

Reply to Anonymous

Higher price, doesn't necessarily mean better sound.... My Xonar DG was only like $30 but, to me, it sounds better than my $100 Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer....

Reply to sykozis

neither does different sound mean better...

Reply to MEgamer

sykozis wrote :

Higher price, doesn't necessarily mean better sound.... My Xonar DG was only like $30 but, to me, it sounds better than my $100 Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer....


Hah, well, there's your problem. The XtremeGamer isn't exactly a card known for amazing sound quality. Get yourself an Asus Xonar D2X or Essence STX and you'll see that it's newer technology that means better sound, and newer technology generally means higher price. :)

Reply to someguynamedmatt

Now you're implying that price and sound quality scale together. The Xonar Essence STX and D2X are both $200...the X-Fi TitaniumHD is $162 and according to reviews produces excellent sound quality...even for a Creative product.

Reply to sykozis

My vote is for soundcard
I have a Asus DG
I use analog surround sound so sounds much better
I also record keyboard,guitar and vocals the extra
inputs with better sampling are necessary

Reply to king smp

no to the soundcard at your situation, get some better speakers first.

Reply to MEgamer
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Sound Cards > Yes or No to a soundcard?
Go to:

There are 1607 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Help Understaing Hardware Montior readings
By DJDeCiBeL, 1 hour ago:

 I agree with that assessment, and with the temps in that range, it's nothing to...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts