I am building my first system and would like input on the choice of a cpu for video editing with Cyberlink Power Director 9. According to their website, the program supports all the bells and whistles to accelerate the process including multicore processors, hyperthreading, and hardware acceleration on the CPU like Intel's Quick Sync and hardware acceleration on the GPU like AMDs APP and NVidia's CUDA. However, these hardware accelerations, separate from processing on the CPU with software, appear to detract from quality at the expense of shortening time (see http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/video-transcoding-amd-app-nvidia-cuda-intel-quicksync,2839-13.html).
If I am taking the time to edit an HD camcorder video from a family event, I want the best quality end product. If that means taking another half hour or hour for video encoding/transcoding to happen what's the big deal - I can do some work or watch TV until it's over. And since this is a once ever 2 month project, it's not that inconvenient. So my question is how much CPU power is really needed to get the job done in a reasonable amount of time? - not looking at who does it the fastest according to some stupid benchmark involving fps?
My choices are:
1. Buy the best - an Intel 2600K core i-7 processor and pair it with a Z68 motherboard which costs around $315 for the processor and $170 for the motherboard (total cost $485). Looking at other core processors and 1366 MBs, the cost is much the same for any core i-7 with 4 cores and hyperthreading.
2. Buy the next best Intel - an Intel 2500K core i-5 processor (no hyperthreading) paired with a Z68 motherboard and that will be $219 for the processor and same $170 for the MB, total cost $389.
3. Go to an AMD Phenom II X6 1100T or 1090T at around $179 plus an AM3 board with 870 chipset at around $90 - total cost at $269 for 6 cores but no hyperthreading and MB with all the SATA 3 and USB 3.0 outputs you need!
4. Go to the cheapest option with 4 cores - and AMD Phenom X 965 Black Edition at $119 with the same AMD MB as in #3 - total cost for 4 cores and no hyperthreading at only $209!
So the difference between #1 and #4 is about $275, enough to totally pay for #4! The issue I would like to raise is HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU SAVE IN EDITING AND PRODUCING A 1 HOUR HD VIDEO on Power Director among these options? I one told me it was 3 hours, I'd pay up, but if only an hour, I'd rather pocket the money, do some work while the computer churns away and take the money 2 years later to buy another processor/MB.
Any comments on the TIME required? I'm not interested in what is the best or quoting benchmarks - please give practical real world answers.
Thanks!!
If I am taking the time to edit an HD camcorder video from a family event, I want the best quality end product. If that means taking another half hour or hour for video encoding/transcoding to happen what's the big deal - I can do some work or watch TV until it's over. And since this is a once ever 2 month project, it's not that inconvenient. So my question is how much CPU power is really needed to get the job done in a reasonable amount of time? - not looking at who does it the fastest according to some stupid benchmark involving fps?
My choices are:
1. Buy the best - an Intel 2600K core i-7 processor and pair it with a Z68 motherboard which costs around $315 for the processor and $170 for the motherboard (total cost $485). Looking at other core processors and 1366 MBs, the cost is much the same for any core i-7 with 4 cores and hyperthreading.
2. Buy the next best Intel - an Intel 2500K core i-5 processor (no hyperthreading) paired with a Z68 motherboard and that will be $219 for the processor and same $170 for the MB, total cost $389.
3. Go to an AMD Phenom II X6 1100T or 1090T at around $179 plus an AM3 board with 870 chipset at around $90 - total cost at $269 for 6 cores but no hyperthreading and MB with all the SATA 3 and USB 3.0 outputs you need!
4. Go to the cheapest option with 4 cores - and AMD Phenom X 965 Black Edition at $119 with the same AMD MB as in #3 - total cost for 4 cores and no hyperthreading at only $209!
So the difference between #1 and #4 is about $275, enough to totally pay for #4! The issue I would like to raise is HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU SAVE IN EDITING AND PRODUCING A 1 HOUR HD VIDEO on Power Director among these options? I one told me it was 3 hours, I'd pay up, but if only an hour, I'd rather pocket the money, do some work while the computer churns away and take the money 2 years later to buy another processor/MB.
Any comments on the TIME required? I'm not interested in what is the best or quoting benchmarks - please give practical real world answers.
Thanks!!