Hd 2600 pro ddr3 vs 7600gt ddr3, which is the best one?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
T

thanh1056

Distinguished
Jan 18, 2011
17
0
18,510
I have an computer which consists of
- PSU : colorsit 450w noname ( 226.5w real)
- CPU: Pentium 4 3ghz
- Ram 1GB
- Main: intel D945gccr
I want to upgrade my computer. I am going to buy a VGA, but I don't know which the best one to play pes 11 is: hd 2600 pro ddr3 vs 7600gt ddr3
Please help me by choosing the best one for my computer.
I want to play pes 11. I don't know my PSu can provide enough electricity.

Sorry for my English knowledge.
 
Solution
nforce4max


Read my previous post and you will get the idea why. The shader performance of the 7600gt is CRAP in newer games that would favor more modern card or ati. I will say this and got it from a presentation dating from around 2007 from nvidia. The G70/71 had 800 threads (24 physical shaders) and was very difficult to effectively program and when they diverged performance tanked. The G73 is no different and suffered all the same. Cards that I have owned from this generation. 2x evga 7600gs, 1x evga 7800gs, 3x evga 7900gs ko, 2x alienware 7900gtx duo. So I know this generation better than probably...
Sort by date Sort by votes
nforce4max

nforce4max

Splendid
Sep 9, 2009
8,337
0
31,460
Facedesk for a Lot of you, the 7600gt isn't a very powerful card and is going to suffer heavily in games like crysis even on 800x600. Go with the 2600 pro as it is DX 10 and can still be a great benefit in HD content and is likely to be HDCP compliant unlike the 7600gt. I know the Geforce 7 generation very well and I know that getting a 7600gt is a poor choice.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
nforce4max

nforce4max

Splendid
Sep 9, 2009
8,337
0
31,460
Let me put it this way. I once had two evga 7600gs in sli and they for the time did a decent job playing the games that I played at the time except for cyrsis. To put it short my 2400 pro did a better job than that setup. Two 7600gs in sli is a Lot faster than a single 7600gt and yet a 2400 pro smoked them and that 2600 pro is roughly 3 times the shader count than my old 2400 pro. Double the physical path and four times than bandwidth. Sure the fill rates aren't that great but shader will more than make up for it.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
nforce4max

nforce4max

Splendid
Sep 9, 2009
8,337
0
31,460


Read my previous post and you will get the idea why. The shader performance of the 7600gt is CRAP in newer games that would favor more modern card or ati. I will say this and got it from a presentation dating from around 2007 from nvidia. The G70/71 had 800 threads (24 physical shaders) and was very difficult to effectively program and when they diverged performance tanked. The G73 is no different and suffered all the same. Cards that I have owned from this generation. 2x evga 7600gs, 1x evga 7800gs, 3x evga 7900gs ko, 2x alienware 7900gtx duo. So I know this generation better than probably any one here on the forum and I can tell you that you shouldn't get this card as it does not do very well in shader heavy games ware the 2600 pro would wipe it on the floor regardless of fill rates. If you can't understand even these two posts then you shouldn't be gaming or using a windows or Linux based machine and just settle instead with a mac. I use all three as I have to for school and play.

2600 pro > 7600gt
FTW...........FTF
Good fps.....Not so good fps....
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
T

thanh1056

Distinguished
Jan 18, 2011
17
0
18,510


thanks for your helps.
I want some opinions from others which I should choose, 7600 gt or 2600 pro.
Thank you so much nforce4max. Can you give me your yahoo nick?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom