geforces

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2011
26
0
18,530
Hello,

I am planning to buy a new rig mainly for gaming and movies. These are the components I have in mind:

GPU - MSI Radeon 6950 2GB:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=14-127-575&SortField=0&SummaryType=0&Pagesize=10&PurchaseMark=&SelectedRating=-1&VideoOnlyMark=False&VendorMark=false&IsFeedbackTab=true&Keywords=%28keywords%29
CPU - Intel Core i5-2500K:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115072&cm_re=intel_core_i5-2500k-_-19-115-072-_-Product
RAM - CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233144&cm_re=Corsair_Vengeance_8_GB-_-20-233-144-_-Product
Motherboard - MSI P67A-GD65:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130574&cm_re=MSI_P67A-_-13-130-574-_-Product
HDD - Seagate Barracuda 1.5TB 7200 RPM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148337
SSD - Possibly if they are worth it
PSU - Looking for one around 700W
Case - Anything that the components will fit into

Overclocking - Yes
SLI - I wish
Current Monitor - 22 inch with 1680 x 1050 res

Are these components compatible? Any recomendations?
 
Solution
Where are you getting 100$ from? SLI 560's is 460$, CF 6950 2GB is 500$ WHERE ARE YOU GETTING 100$

Well it's your choice as OP. It looks good. Drop the WD Black for a Samsung F3.

XXF

Distinguished
Jan 24, 2011
35
0
18,540
Are SSDs worth it?

It depends 100% on your budget. If you can get the performance you want out of the CPU and GPU, which the 6950 and i5 2500k will get you, and then can spec out the rest of the PC - 8gb of RAM, suitable Mobo, *GOOD* PSU (XFX or Corsair, and I buy Silver Plus Certified for the energy efficiency), a case you like to look at, and a storage drive and have money left over, of course get an SSD.

If you're struggling to fit things into your budget and are considering cutting corners to get an SSD - don't. They provide significantly faster boot times, but insufficient performance boost once the computer is running to be worth cutting back on other components.

In my opinion looking at your build if it comes down to either a SSD or a 23 or 24 inch 1080p monitor you would do much better going with a new primary monitor (you can still obviously use the current one as a secondary) go with the monitor.

Also keep in mind, since you didn't list anything as not needed, you might need to drop some money on an operating system and optical drive, which can get expensive if you happen to be a Blue-Ray snob.
 

+1 with everything on that post with the exception of the 8GB of RAM. 4GB is more than plenty for a gaming build imo and it leaves the option to add another 4GB later down the road. I see a lot of tight budget builds lately with 8GB for gaming builds when that's a luxury for a large budget and/or a necessity for a photo shop/video editing/CAD build/etc..
 

SteveGP

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2011
23
0
18,510



Memory is so cheap now that this is almost a moot point. I got my 8 GB for $40 after rebate. Just check out the slickdeals forum and you'll get some great prices on memory.
 

majin ssj eric

Distinguished
Mar 2, 2011
395
0
18,810
1080p is definitely the way to go. Also, SSD's are great but don't get anything less than 120GB. My Velociraptor 150GB boot drive is over half full with just Windows 7 Ultimate 64, 3 games, and several programs....
 
^ That's a lie. I have a plethora of movies on my SSD that's within my laptop. It's running a 60gb Kingston and still has 45gb+ left. Games are lets say 7 gigs each, win7 ult takes just about 7 as well. That's about 28gb. So if you think about it you could still put just about 32gb left. So even a 60gb would be a reasonable amount. No need to spend for a 120gb.
 

Somebody_007

Distinguished
Feb 28, 2010
1,933
0
19,860
It depends on how well you use your space on the ssd. Shutting of hibernate can more than half the space win7 takes on your storage decive. If properly used you can get away with suprisingly little SSD storage space. You can also use a cache type system like HDD boost or the built in ones of momentus XT drives which work far better even. 2 Momentus XT drives in raid0 have a combined speed of almost that of a good single SSD, the size of a large HDD(1Tb) whilst only having 8gb of ssd space and only costing 200usd for both

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148591&cm_re=momentus_xt-_-22-148-591-_-Product
 
^ True true. Has a point.

The plus to SSDs though.
- Quiet
- Low power usage
- Less risk, with the Momentus XT if one fails in RAID your files are screwed.

Pros to the Momentus
- Large space
- Fast for an HDD
- Good RAID 0 but refer to risk
- Unsure, but if it is anything like the VelociRaptors, it'll be loud.
 

haphestus

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2011
93
0
18,640
I don't think my advice is terrible as this drive has come down in price massively over the last year, and i own the 128gb version and i have never regretted buying it.

TBH i didn't know about the new sandforce controller being released, and i thank you for bringing it to my attention.

Momentus XT isn't loud but, does hit a sweet spot between performance and cost. Although this will be very short lived.

 

geforces

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2011
26
0
18,530
Thank you for your replys

I might have some trouble fitting both a SSD and a new monitor into my budget, but I will see what I can do.

I found this monitor: http://www.msy.com.au/product.jsp?productId=7275
Its a 24"LED backlit monitor for $200. (I can't buy the monitor from the USA as I am from Australia and it is too big to bring back with me)

As for the SSD I found this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Intel-Internal-Technology-2-5-Inch-SSDSA2MH120G2K5/dp/B00486UR2I/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1302073599&sr=8-1
Its an intel 120GB SSD with very good reviews, it is only 3 GB SATA II but I have no idea if 6 GB even helps that much with performance.




 

geforces

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2011
26
0
18,530
Would it not be better just to spend $70 extra and get a monitor that is LED backlit and is 2.5" larger?

As for the SSD is SATA 6Gb/s worth an extra $50+ for the same storage size?
 
That is really up to you as the OP. The 70$ saved can be allocated to better graphics or just a different SSD. Wait I just looked at your current setup, your monitor is fine. Why upgrade?

That X25M isn't SATA III. It's SATA II. The Intel 510/520 series SSDs are SATA III SSDs.

 

geforces

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2011
26
0
18,530
Since I will be spending about $1000 on the computer, I guess I might as well buy a nice monitor to go with the nice components.

OK if the SSD I found is no good, then please direct me to one (low $200's) which would be better.
 
I'm not saying it's no good. I'm just saying thats 40$ more than the standard 120gb pricing. BTW Intel SSDs aren't really as good as SF-xxxx controller SSDs.

Either wait for the Vertex 3's or get the SF-1220 SSDs.
Correction, the Vertex 3's are already out.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227706
You should wait for the Patriot Wildfires that'll be cheaper 64gb is all you need and the Patriots come in the size. If you really want 120gb+
This:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820211471
Or:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233125
 

geforces

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2011
26
0
18,530
Thanks for the advice

I noticed that the Vertex 3 one you showed me says it will read/write in speeds up to 500MB/s, while the other two were only in the 200'sMB/s.
Does that actually translate to double the speed? If so it sounds like a great deal.
 

majin ssj eric

Distinguished
Mar 2, 2011
395
0
18,810
My point about having a larger SSD is that you don't want to come close to running out of room for programs and games. Better to spend for 120GB now then run out of room 6 months down the road and kick yourself for it....
 
^ Why would store any more games in your SSD? I would only imagine storing CS5 on my SSD. The games on my main HDD. There is no performance difference by storing the game on the SSD. Only load times are affected. And in my personal experience as I'm loading Crysis 2 off my F3, the wait times are not unbearably.

@Geforces Yes that is why waiting for the SATA III SF2200 SSDs would be smart decision.
 

majin ssj eric

Distinguished
Mar 2, 2011
395
0
18,810
That's just crazy! Of course you would want to put games on the ssd! What's the point for a gamer otherwise? To sit around loading and reloading Windows? Lol. The whole purpose of a fast system drive is to be able to load programs (including games) quickly. That's why I recommend enough size to encompass Windows and any other program you may want to install. I personally don't want to be running different programs off of multiple drives and I certainly don't ever want to be worrying about only having 64GB to work with in my supposed super gaming machine....
 
^ Wtf?

It takes me 10 seconds to load a mission on Crysis 2. How much more different can an SSD make? The SSD would be more benefitial to Windows7 boots. I boot CSS in about 10 seconds as well? What difference is 2 more seconds?

I just think 100$ saved can be allocated differently to something like a 580 or 570. Or just SLI 560. That or CF 6950.
 

geforces

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2011
26
0
18,530
An SSD would be very nice, it is anoying that they are so expensive though.
I noticed that for the same price as the Vertex 3 SSD I could CF the 6950. Since my computer will be primarily for gaming will it be better just to CF? I can handle an exta 15 seconds boot time for an extra 40 FPS ingame.