Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

what's diff between Nikon Coolpix 5000 and 5400?

Last response: in Digital Camera
Share
Anonymous
February 17, 2005 11:04:43 AM

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Can someone who knows off the top of their head tell me the difference
between Nikon Coolpix 5000 and the later 5400? I've been lusting after the
5400 (can get new with 512MB FC for ~$350), but I might be able to get a
used 5000 for quite a bit less. What improvements did Nikon make between the
5000 model and the 5400? And neat features the 5400 has that the 5000 does
not?

thanks for any help,
dg
Anonymous
February 17, 2005 11:04:44 AM

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Nikon Coolpix 5400 vs. Coolpix 5000.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikoncp5400/

"dan glenn" <dan_danboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:veYQd.784$Pz7.428@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
> Can someone who knows off the top of their head tell me the difference
> between Nikon Coolpix 5000 and the later 5400? I've been lusting after the
> 5400 (can get new with 512MB FC for ~$350), but I might be able to get a
> used 5000 for quite a bit less. What improvements did Nikon make between
the
> 5000 model and the 5400? And neat features the 5400 has that the 5000 does
> not?
>
> thanks for any help,
> dg
>
>
Anonymous
February 17, 2005 1:44:18 PM

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

The links are handy, that said, the differences are basically:

* The 5400 has 4x zoom instead of 3x, both start out at 28mm (equivalent)
* The 5400 has customizable menus, for instance I can have Flash options
(flash exposure compensation) on the 1st page rather than scrolling to the
end
* Both have great image quality, but the 5400 is less prone to blown
highlights (not to say the 5000 is a lemon, the 5400 is better though)
* 5400 has ISO range of 50-400 vs 100-800 for 5000
* The LCD of the 5400 is smaller (1.5 vs 1.8) but on the other hand it
doesn't have "soft buttons" intrude on the LCD space the way the 5000 does
* The 5000 put the flash sensor cell near the handgrip in an awful place,
the 5400 moved it to a more sensible place
* Revised controls--the 5000 resembles the 5700 a lot, the 5400 less so
* The 5400 loses the LCD "control panel"
* The 5400 has "scene" modes and a very quick way to go to "auto" mode
* The 5400 offers rear-curtain sync (I never use it)

That's it in a nutshell.

LRH
Related resources
Anonymous
February 17, 2005 3:25:50 PM

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

DPReview compares them very well:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikoncp5400/

"dan glenn" <dan_danboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:veYQd.784$Pz7.428@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
> Can someone who knows off the top of their head tell me the difference
> between Nikon Coolpix 5000 and the later 5400? I've been lusting after the
> 5400 (can get new with 512MB FC for ~$350), but I might be able to get a
> used 5000 for quite a bit less. What improvements did Nikon make between
> the 5000 model and the 5400? And neat features the 5400 has that the 5000
> does not?
>
> thanks for any help,
> dg
>
Anonymous
February 17, 2005 10:24:08 PM

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Thanks to all, especially Larry. Very helpful!

-dg

"Larry R Harrison Jr" <noone@noone.net> wrote in message
news:3L4Rd.90670$0u.30615@fed1read04...
> The links are handy, that said, the differences are basically:
>
> * The 5400 has 4x zoom instead of 3x, both start out at 28mm (equivalent)
> * The 5400 has customizable menus, for instance I can have Flash options
> (flash exposure compensation) on the 1st page rather than scrolling to the
> end
> * Both have great image quality, but the 5400 is less prone to blown
> highlights (not to say the 5000 is a lemon, the 5400 is better though)
> * 5400 has ISO range of 50-400 vs 100-800 for 5000
> * The LCD of the 5400 is smaller (1.5 vs 1.8) but on the other hand it
> doesn't have "soft buttons" intrude on the LCD space the way the 5000 does
> * The 5000 put the flash sensor cell near the handgrip in an awful place,
> the 5400 moved it to a more sensible place
> * Revised controls--the 5000 resembles the 5700 a lot, the 5400 less so
> * The 5400 loses the LCD "control panel"
> * The 5400 has "scene" modes and a very quick way to go to "auto" mode
> * The 5400 offers rear-curtain sync (I never use it)
>
> That's it in a nutshell.
>
> LRH
>
>
Anonymous
February 18, 2005 1:21:14 AM

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

No problem. And no offense meant, seriously, but I typically try to answer
questions with actual explanations and not just links alone. That said, the
link given is very helpful.

LRH
!