Enter for a chance to win a Ballistic Gaming Computer.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Took these today on Lake Dardanelle in Arkansas. http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 4360rCuZHd http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 6861dugJxf Weatherman was wrong and it was nice at 66 degrees and Sunny. Art Salmons Fleeting Images Photography
Fyimo wrote: > Took these today on Lake Dardanelle in Arkansas. > > http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 4360rCuZHd > http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 6861dugJxf > > > Nice shots. But I thought this camera had zero noise? :-) -- Stacey
It also depends on how small of a portion you use out of the original picture. Art
Some of these are 35% of the original image blown up to 8x10. Not great but Ok. Art
Fyimo wrote: > Took these today on Lake Dardanelle in Arkansas. > > http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 4360rCuZHd > http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 6861dugJxf Pelicans.. My favorite bird. I can watch them all day :-) Good shots..
In message <37ob8iF5grb4mU3@individual.net>, Stacey <fotocord@yahoo.com> wrote: >Fyimo wrote: >> Took these today on Lake Dardanelle in Arkansas. >> http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 4360rCuZHd >> http://client.webshots.com/photo/2 [...] 6861dugJxf >Nice shots. >But I thought this camera had zero noise? :-) You thought wrong, but really, these images are so full of JPEG compression, I don't know how you can see the noise. -- <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm> ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
Fyimo wrote: > It also depends on how small of a portion you use out of the original > picture. > > No problem, I like them just fine. More a comment after reading all the bashing about how anything -non- canon is a useless noisebox. -- Stacey
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.