I personally own a AMD Phenom II X6 1090T. Now I have for a long time seen many many benchmarks showing is short comings and I both under stand them and feel there findings make sense but I posse a question to the community because to be honest I'm not sure I know the answer. First off let me put forth a situation you have a generic W7 PC with the before mentioned CPU a high end GPU and 8GB of ram. Now lets say that system had several back ground programming running on a regular basis virus software, voip servers, skype ,aim things of this nature small but numerous enough to take up lets says 10-20% of the processor at any given time if you where to boot up a heavy usage processes lets say adobe photo shop of flash catalyst or a game that can use all four cores. Would the system see a performance boost over a Quad core AMD of the same speed due to the fact that 4/6 cores could be 100% taken up bye the program/game and the other 2 cores could handle the back ground programs. On paper I would think the answer would be that the x6 would outperform a x4 in this situation but my under standing of how the OS threads commands from programs to up to 6 cores isn't that solid. Secondly if this is the case how come we never see multi tasking benchmarks I feel they would be much more real life it might just be me but I commonly run multiple programs at once some of which take alot of CPU power for instance does a x6 beat a x4 in 3dmark if your also encodeing a video? I think the idea of some one having some thing running like a video encoder or 7-zip running while they might wanna play a game or do some photo shop work is not out of the question. Comments ideas Note: I am simply trying to get a under standing not start a flame war about Intel's current superiority to AMD when it comes to there top end offerings.