Can Nvidia GT 430 run Crysis....?????

Man then tell what's the price & the power consumtion of the HD 4870...

i was simply saying it wont run crysis on those settings and the op didnt ask for power consuming figures please read properly before judging my post thankyou.

good point my bad

The GT 430 is a lite-weight gaming card at best. The following is the performance in Crysis Warhead with everything maxed out and is tested in a computer with an i7-975X Extreme Edition. Expect about a 5% - 15% decrease in performance if you are using a slower CPU. Only 1600 x 900 resolution has been benchmarked.



http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/v [...] html#sect4

The GT 430 is too weak to really make use of DX11. The most talked about effect is Tessellation which is on-the-fly increase in the actual number of polygons to increase details. It is a processing power hog. Assuming Crysis Warhead was a DX11 title, then I would knock off about another 20% of performance if you were to play the with a GT 430 in DX11 mode.

I want to run Crysis Warhead on 1360 * 768 VGA Monitor.
Will GT 430 run it good on this resolution?

I have few more chices --- Nvidia GT 440 512 MB
ATi HD 5670 512 MB
Nvidia GT 210 1024 MB
Nvidia GT 220 1024 MB
Nvidia GTS 450 1024 MB


Please Tell me which one is the best
According to me GTS 450 is best but please I want to know more....

what are the rest of the system specs including your power supply.?

The Biggest bottleneck is your processor.even if you get gtx 460 it would be sickenly bottlenecked by your cpu because of a single core.you would have to upgrade your processor too.i would suggest any intel dual core of pentium 5x00 series.

so the Pentium 4 is not good?

instead of not good it is better to say that pentium 4 was way generation behind. when they first came out it might pretty decent but that was 5-6 years ago. right now there are more and more program can benefit from 2 cores or more so single core pentium 4 will have to struggle to run new software especially that rely heavily on cpu cores such as video editing program. i still remember when my pentium 4 can't load power director 8 because lack of processing power. when i got my e7500 the software was able to run just fine. honestly even some C2D or C2Q processor at their stock clock will bottleneck today's mid-range cards. my advice to you is if you don't have the money to change your platform then just upgrade your processor to C2D or C2Q. your motherboard should be able to support it. then take something better than GT430 such as HD5750 that you have in mind

I just looked for i3 and it is having 2 cores with a speed of 3.1GHz.
Its price is in my reach .....

I have a Nvidia 8400 GS (512mb) and i want to know that if i use it with the i3 than can i get good performance in Crysis by minimizing the quality????

you mean that my motherboard won't supprot it..

you have issues, and you not going to be able to accomplish anything with your current system that you want.
how much $ do you have for new hardware, what's your budget total.?

what's your current motherboard in detail please.?
and where are you located (US or UK.?)

My motherboard is Intel G31
Processor - Pentium 4 (641) 3.20 GHz (With Hyper-Threading)
Socket 775 LGA, 65 nm, 1 core, 2 threads, 2 MB L2 Cache, RAM - 2 GB DDR2 + 512 MB DDR2 and PCI-Express x16....

This is the data i got form CPU-Z...

GTS450, I have one:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814127521
MSI N450GTS CYCLONE 1GD5/OC GeForce GTS 450 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP

but you need to solidify the rest of your system.
P4 just isn't going to do it, have you decided on new motherboard and processor.?

more specifically, what is your motherboard.?

g31 you can put in an e7500 as it is 1066fsb which is all your MB supports. even an e6500 would be a significant improvement and would go well with a gt240. be careful of pcie 2.1 cards like ati 5xxx series, as they sometimes have issues with older motherboards such as yours and dont work. You could even look at second hand 8800gt or 9800gt or gts250 which would be better than a gt240. If it were my computer, i would get the e7500 and a gts250 or if that goes over your budget drop the cpu to an e6500, and if your still over budget with that get the e6500 and a gt240 or second hand 8800gt.

Thanks for this man
I'll go with a E7500
what about E6550 . (Just for knowledge)

Dual Core 3Ghz..
4GB DDR2 800mhz
GT430 1GB
1360x768

can i run crysis2 on medium settings? or can i play it on this system?

how many fps will i get with these settings..??

http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 766-5.html

Turn off all the bells and whistles, keep the AA and AF minimal, and sure you could play Crysis and Crysis 2, but it's not going to look nearly as pretty or smooth as the screen-shots and videos you've seen.

http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/

The closer to the minimum requirements the closer to minimal settings and resolution you'll have to play the game. Recommended is typically for medium to high settings and 30+ FPS. Beyond recommended with cutting edge technology is a whole entire other story and typical of enthusiasts.

Crysis runs in DX9 or DX10 and the DX10 path will require more in fact it will probably require the recommended specifications to be playable. DX11 results in more performance at less of a tax than DX10, but I wouldn't touch either with a GTS 430 except in games that use DX11 as an optimization such as WoW. I'd just test each API and see which you prefer, you may have to choose between low settings in DX11 and medium settings in DX9 in Crysis 2 for example.

I have a Dual Core E5700.. I think crysis 2 is playable on GT430? I get 40-60 Fps ( 45 Average) in Black OPS..

heck just go buy a new pc that thing wont play it simple im not been nasty or big headed its the truth i would go amd am3 as is the cheapest platform atm compared to intel but the core i5 alternative is a nice buy and add a 5770.